Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
Police-Public Relations are crucial for effective and democratic policing. The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) and various police reform committees have issued guidelines to improve this relationship by fostering trust, transparency, and cooperation.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Let's evaluate each option in the context of standard police practices and guidelines:
(A) Giving absolute authority to local people for crime investigation: This is fundamentally incorrect and illegal. Crime investigation is a statutory duty and power vested exclusively in the police under the Code of Criminal Procedure. While public cooperation is vital, giving them "absolute authority" would lead to anarchy and is not a recommended or applicable guideline.
(B) Providing a toll-free telephone number for the public: This is a standard measure to make the police more accessible to the public for reporting crimes and emergencies.
(C) Developing systems for transparency: Measures like online FIR filing, status tracking, and public display of information are key recommendations to enhance transparency and accountability.
(D) Monthly meeting of the SHO with the public: This is a key component of community policing, aimed at building trust, gathering local intelligence, and resolving minor issues at the local level.
Step 3: Final Answer:
Giving absolute authority to the public for investigation is contrary to the rule of law and is not a valid guideline for police-public relations. Therefore, it is the correct answer for what is "not applicable."