According to Russell's "On Denoting", the proposition "The prime number between 7 and 11 is NOT larger than 12" would be true, if _______.
The expression "the prime number between 7 and 11" has a primary occurrence in the proposition
The expression "the prime number between 7 and 11" has a secondary occurrence in the proposition
Under Russell's analysis, "The F is not G" has two readings:
• Secondary occurrence (wide–scope negation): $\neg\exists!x\,[F(x)\land G(x)]$. If the definite description denotes nothing, the whole statement is true. For "the prime between 7 and 11", in fact no such prime exists; hence with secondary occurrence the proposition is true. (C)
• Primary occurrence (narrow–scope negation): $\exists!x\,[F(x)\land \neg G(x)]$. This requires that there be exactly one such prime and that it is not larger than 12. If (counterfactually) there were exactly one prime between 7 and 11, it would certainly be $\le 10$, hence "not larger than 12" would hold; the proposition would then be true. (D)
Why (A) is not sufficient: The falsity of the converse does not by itself determine the truth of the given sentence under Russell's analysis.
Why (B) is wrong: With primary occurrence but no such prime (the actual case), the proposition is false, not true.
Here are two analogous groups, Group-I and Group-II, that list words in their decreasing order of intensity. Identify the missing word in Group-II.
Abuse \( \rightarrow \) Insult \( \rightarrow \) Ridicule
__________ \( \rightarrow \) Praise \( \rightarrow \) Appreciate
In the following figure, four overlapping shapes (rectangle, triangle, circle, and hexagon) are given. The sum of the numbers which belong to only two overlapping shapes is ________