Step 1: The paragraph should discuss the government’s actions regarding public sector companies and form a coherent narrative. We need to identify the sentence that disrupts this coherence.
Step 2: Sentence D introduces the topic: the government is doing something drastic (the unthinkable) after funding losses of public sector companies. This sets the stage.
Step 3: Sentence A specifies the unthinkable action: “turning off the tap” (stopping funding), logically following D.
Step 4: Sentence C explains that the private sector faced similar issues in the past due to closure difficulties, providing historical context to the government’s action.
Step 5: Sentence B concludes by discussing the government’s dilemma due to lack of consensus on exit policy, wrapping up the paragraph.
Step 6: Sentence E, which states that private and public sector companies act similarly in crises, is too general and does not fit the specific narrative about the government’s actions and its consequences. It disrupts the flow of D-A-C-B, which focuses on the government’s funding decision and its implications.
Verification: The sequence D-A-C-B forms a coherent paragraph: government’s drastic action (D), what the action is (A), historical context (C), and current dilemma (B). E introduces an unrelated comparison.