We evaluate the logical consistency of option (c): ADF
A: No barbarian is gentleman.
D: No gentlemen are rude.
F: All barbarians are rude.
Step 1: Consider A and F together.
- A says no barbarian is a gentleman.
- F says all barbarians are rude.
This implies a logical classification where:
\[
\text{Barbarian} \subset \text{Rude} \quad \text{and} \quad \text{Barbarian} \cap \text{Gentleman} = \emptyset
\]
Step 2: Now consider D: No gentlemen are rude.
- If all rude people are not gentlemen (D), and barbarians are all rude (F), then:
\[
\text{Barbarian} \cap \text{Gentleman} = \emptyset
\]
Which is exactly what A asserts.
Conclusion:
Statements A, D, and F are logically aligned and reinforce each other. They form a consistent logical group.
Check other options briefly:
- (a) ABE: E contradicts F, and B contradicts A.
- (b) BCE: Contradictory — B and C don’t connect to E clearly.
- (d) BDE: B contradicts A; inconsistent with D.