Question

A intentionally and falsely leads B to believe that certain land belongs to A, and thereby induces B to buy and pay for it. The land afterwards becomes the property of A, and A seeks to set aside the sale on the ground that, at the time of the sale, he had no title. He will not be allowed to prove his want of title. - Which Section of the Evidence Act is applicable?

• A. Section 92
• B. Section 124
• C. Section 115
• D. Section 101

Hint:

Estoppel under Section 115 prevents a person from contradicting their previous statements that another party has relied upon.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is C

Step 1: Understanding Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act.
Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act deals with the concept of estoppel, which prevents a person from asserting something that contradicts a statement or representation previously made, especially if it has been relied upon by another party. In this case, A is estopped from claiming that he had no title, after inducing B to purchase the land based on the false representation.
Step 2: Explanation of the options.
- (a) Section 92: Deals with exclusion of oral evidence to contradict written documents, not relevant here.
- (b) Section 124: Deals with the protection of communications between an agent and principal, irrelevant to this case.
- (c) Section 115: This is the correct answer, as estoppel prevents A from denying his title after inducing B to act on false representation.
- (d) Section 101: Deals with the burden of proof, but not directly related to this issue.
Step 3: Conclusion.
Thus, the correct answer is (c) Section 115.