Question:
A company, XYZ Corp., operates a large dam to generate electricity. Due to an unforeseen design flaw the dam suddenly bursts, causing massive flooding in a nearby town. The company had taken all standard safety measures and had no knowledge of the design flaw. The affected residents sue the company for damages.
Which of the following is applicable in this instance?
A company, XYZ Corp., operates a large dam to generate electricity. Due to an unforeseen design flaw the dam suddenly bursts, causing massive flooding in a nearby town. The company had taken all standard safety measures and had no knowledge of the design flaw. The affected residents sue the company for damages.
Which of the following is applicable in this instance?
Which of the following is applicable in this instance?
Show Hint
In hazardous industries, the rule of absolute liability means responsibility for damage exists even without fault or negligence.
Updated On: Jan 14, 2026
- The company is not liable because the flaw was unforeseen.
- The company is absolutely liable because the operation of the dam is inherently dangerous and the damages occurred regardless of the fault.
- The company is liable only if it is proven that they ignored warning signs of the flaw.
- The company is not liable because it followed all safety protocols.
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is B
Solution and Explanation
This case falls under the principle of Absolute Liability, which was established in India by the Supreme Court in the Oleum Gas Leak case (MC Mehta v. Union of India, 1987). According to this principle, if an enterprise engages in a hazardous or inherently dangerous activity and harm results to anyone, the enterprise is absolutely liable to compensate the affected persons, regardless of negligence, foreseeability, or precautions taken.
Option (A) is incorrect — absolute liability applies even if the flaw was unforeseen.
Option (B) is correct — the inherently dangerous nature of dam operation imposes absolute liability.
Option (C) is incorrect — fault or warning signs are irrelevant under absolute liability.
Option (D) is incorrect — compliance with safety norms doesn’t absolve liability under this rule.
Option (A) is incorrect — absolute liability applies even if the flaw was unforeseen.
Option (B) is correct — the inherently dangerous nature of dam operation imposes absolute liability.
Option (C) is incorrect — fault or warning signs are irrelevant under absolute liability.
Option (D) is incorrect — compliance with safety norms doesn’t absolve liability under this rule.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top Questions on Law of Torts
- What must be shown before the court to obtain an injunction to stop nuisance?
- AILET LLM - 2026
- Legal Studies
- Law of Torts
- It is well recognized that actionable negligence in context of medical profession involves three constituents (i) duty to exercise due care; (ii) breach of duty and (iii) consequential damage. However, a simple lack of care, an error of judgment or an accident is not sufficient proof of negligence on part of the medical professional so long as the doctor follows the acceptable practice of the medical profession in discharge of his duties. He cannot be held liable for negligence merely because a better alternative treatment or course of treatment was available or that more skilled doctors were there who could have administered better treatment.
A medical professional may be held liable for negligence only when he is not pos sessed with the requisite qualification or skill or when he fails to exercise reasonable skill which he possesses in giving the treatment. None of the above two essential conditions for establishing negligence stand satisfied in the case at hand as no ev idence was brought on record to prove that Dr. Neeraj Sud had not exercised due diligence, care or skill which he possessed in operating the patient and giving treatment to him. When reasonable care, expected of the medical professional, is extended or rendered to the patient unless contrary is proved, it would not be a case for actionable negligence.
tracted with edits and revisions from Neeraj Sud v Jaswinder Singh 2024 INSC 825- CLAT PG - 2026
- Legal Studies
- Law of Torts
- Which among the following cases are connected to Volunti Non Fit Injuria?
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- LLM
- Law of Torts
- Which among the following are covered under the defences of nuisance?
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- LLM
- Law of Torts
Match List-I with List-II\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{Provision} & \textbf{Case Law} \\ \hline \text{(A) Strict Liability} & \text{(1) Ryland v. Fletcher} \\ \hline \text{(B) Absolute Liability} & \text{(II) M.C. Mehta v. Union of India} \\ \hline \text{(C) Negligence} & \text{(III) Nicholas v. Marsland} \\ \hline \text{(D) Act of God} & \text{(IV) MCD v. Subhagwanti} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- LLM
- Law of Torts
View More Questions
Questions Asked in CBSE CLASS XII exam
- Two point charges of \( -5\,\mu C \) and \( 2\,\mu C \) are located in free space at \( (-4\,\text{cm}, 0) \) and \( (6\,\text{cm}, 0) \) respectively.
(a) Calculate the amount of work done to separate the two charges at infinite distance.
(b) If this system of charges was initially kept in an electric field \[ \vec{E} = \frac{A}{r^2}, \text{ where } A = 8 \times 10^4\, \text{N}\,\text{C}^{-1}\,\text{m}^2, \] calculate the electrostatic potential energy of the system.- CBSE CLASS XII - 2025
- Electrostatics
- 4,000 shares of ₹ 10 each were forfeited for non-payment of second and final call money of ₹ 2 per share. The minimum amount that the company must collect at the time of reissue of these shares will be :
- CBSE CLASS XII - 2025
- Accounting for Share Capital
- If $y = a \cos(\log x) + b \sin(\log x)$, then $x^2y'' + xy'1$ is:
- CBSE CLASS XII - 2025
- Continuity and differentiability
A ladder of fixed length \( h \) is to be placed along the wall such that it is free to move along the height of the wall.
Based upon the above information, answer the following questions:(iii) (b) If the foot of the ladder, whose length is 5 m, is being pulled towards the wall such that the rate of decrease of distance \( y \) is \( 2 \, \text{m/s} \), then at what rate is the height on the wall \( x \) increasing when the foot of the ladder is 3 m away from the wall?
- CBSE CLASS XII - 2025
- Application of derivatives
- A meeting will be held only if all three members A, B and C are present. The probability that member A does not turn up is 0.10, member B does not turn up is 0.20 and member C does not turn up is 0.05. The probability of the meeting being cancelled is:
- CBSE CLASS XII - 2025
- Probability
View More Questions