Step 1: Understanding “retrenchment” under Section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
“Retrenchment” means the termination of a worker’s service by the employer for any reason whatsoever, except in cases of:
- Disciplinary action (misconduct),
- Voluntary retirement,
- Superannuation, or
- Non-renewal of a contract.
Step 2: Application to the case.
In the given scenario, the workers were terminated because of misconduct, and a proper disciplinary enquiry was held. Termination on disciplinary grounds does not constitute “retrenchment” under Section 2(oo). Therefore, the workers are not entitled to retrenchment compensation.
Step 3: Analysis of options.
(A) Incorrect — Termination for misconduct is excluded from retrenchment.
(B) Incorrect — There is no violation if the disciplinary process was duly followed.
(C) Correct — Misconduct-based termination is not retrenchment; hence, no compensation.
(D) Incorrect — Lay-off occurs due to temporary inability to employ, not misconduct.
Step 4: Conclusion.
Thus, the termination does not amount to retrenchment and the workers are not entitled to compensation.