Step 1: Understanding the Question:
This question refers to the categorization of jurisprudence into two distinct types: 'Expositorial Jurisprudence' and 'Censorial Jurisprudence.' The key concept is the division of jurisprudence into different kinds based on certain characteristics, and the focus is on identifying the legal scholar who made this categorization.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation of the Options:
- (A) Holland: This is the correct answer. Holland made the distinction between 'Expositorial' and 'Censorial' jurisprudence. 'Expositorial' jurisprudence refers to the objective analysis and explanation of legal rules, while 'Censorial' jurisprudence concerns the critique of the law.
- (B) Bentham: Bentham is known for his contributions to utilitarianism and legal positivism, but he did not categorize jurisprudence in this way. He focused on the role of law in promoting the greatest happiness.
- (C) Kelsen: Kelsen is best known for his Pure Theory of Law, which was focused on the structure and sources of law, but he did not divide jurisprudence into 'Expositorial' and 'Censorial.'
- (D) Paton: Paton was a noted legal scholar who worked on legal philosophy and jurisprudence but did not make this specific categorization. His contributions were more focused on concepts like justice and the philosophy of law.
Step 3: Final Conclusion:
The correct answer is (A) Holland, as he is the scholar who made this particular categorization of jurisprudence.