Step 1: Understanding the conclusion.
The passage presents three different theories for the extinction of the giant ground sloth: human hunting, climate change, and hyper-disease. The author doesn't conclude that any one theory completely explains the extinction, but rather that each theory has some validity.
Step 2: Analysis of options.
- (A) This option does not align with the passage's conclusion, as the author presents multiple possible explanations rather than dismissing the topic altogether.
- (B) While humans are discussed as a potential cause, the passage does not conclude that the cause is certain.
- (C) This option is correct because it reflects the passage's summary that none of the theories fully explains the extinction but each offers useful insights.
- (D) This option introduces a new idea about human extinction, which isn't addressed in the passage.
- (E) The passage doesn't suggest combining the theories into one. It maintains that each theory has its own merit.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (C), as it accurately reflects the main point of the passage, which is that no single theory fully explains the extinction but each provides some valuable insight.
If \(8x + 5x + 2x + 4x = 114\), then, \(5x + 3 = ?\)
If \(r = 5 z\) then \(15 z = 3 y,\) then \(r =\)