To determine the correct statements, let's analyze each option:
(A) Biography of a saint or a religious leader is called Hagiography.
This statement is correct. 'Hagiography' refers to the writing about the lives of saints or religious leaders.
(B) Biography of a saint or a religious leader is called Topography.
This statement is incorrect. 'Topography' refers to the detailed mapping or charting of the features of an area, not biographies.
(C) Hagiographies inform us about the beliefs of the followers of a particular tradition.
This statement is correct. Hagiographies often provide insights into the religious practices and beliefs of followers by depicting the stories of revered figures.
(D) Nobody recorded the histories of saints and religious leaders.
This statement is incorrect. There are numerous recorded histories of saints and religious leaders throughout various cultures and religions.
(E) Written sources do not help us in knowing history.
This statement is incorrect. Written sources are critical in understanding and learning about historical events, including religious histories.
Based on this analysis, the correct answer is: (A) and (C) only.
Hagiography is a genre of writing that focuses on the biography of a saint or a religious figure. These writings typically highlight the saint's virtues, miracles, and spiritual achievements, and they often serve to inspire followers and strengthen their beliefs.
Beyond being a mere biographical account, hagiographies also provide insight into the beliefs and values of the community or religious group that venerates the saint. Through these narratives, the life of the saint is often portrayed as a model of ideal behavior, embodying the spiritual ideals upheld by the followers.
In many cultures, hagiographies have been central in shaping religious traditions, rituals, and the collective identity of faith-based communities. They not only serve to venerate the saint but also reflect the wider religious and social context in which these stories were written.
Declining a Royal Gift
This excerpt from a sufi text describes the proceedings at Shaikh Nizamuddin Auliya’s hospice in 1313 : I (the author, Amir Hasan Sijzi) had the good fortune of kissing his (Shaikh Nizamuddin Auliya’s) feet ... At this time a local ruler had sent him the deed of ownership to two gardens and much land, along with the provisions and tools for their maintenance. The ruler had also made it clear that he was relinquishing all his rights to both the gardens and land. The master ... had not accepted that gift. Instead, he had lamented: “What have I to do with gardens and fields and lands ? ... None of our ... spiritual masters had engaged in such activity.”
Then he told an appropriate story: “... Sultan Ghiyasuddin, who at that time was still known as Ulugh Khan, came to visit Shaikh Fariduddin (and) offered some money and ownership deeds for four villages to the Shaikh, the money being for the benefit of the dervishes (sufis), and the land for his use. Smiling, Shaikh al Islam (Fariduddin) said: ‘Give me the money. I will dispense it to the dervishes. But as for those land deeds, keep them. There are many who long for them. Give them away to such persons.’”