India's relationship with the UN Convention Against Torture (UNCAT) is a point of legal interest. To understand India's stance, consider the following analysis:
**Statement Analysis:**
- India is not a signatory to the UN Convention Against Torture.
This statement is incorrect. India has signed the convention. - India has signed the UN Convention Against Torture but has not ratified it.
This is the correct statement. Although India signed UNCAT in 1997, it has yet to ratify it, which means it agrees in principle but has not yet incorporated it into domestic law. - The Supreme Court has asked the Union of India to introduce a domestic legislation against torture.
This statement reflects ongoing judicial recommendations but does not directly define India's legal position regarding the convention. - Torture is defined as a crime in the Indian Penal Code.
This is incorrect, as Indian law currently lacks a distinct legal framework defining and criminalizing torture specifically as understood in international discussions.
In conclusion, the statement that best captures India's position on torture regarding international conventions is:India has signed the UN Convention Against Torture but has not ratified it.