Comparing common digital modulation schemes in terms of probability of error (\(P_e\)) for a given signal-to-noise ratio (\(E_b/N_0\)) in an Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) channel:
- ASK (Amplitude Shift Keying) / OOK (On-Off Keying):
- The error probability for coherent ASK (OOK) is \(P_e = Q(\sqrt{E_b/N_0})\) or \(P_e = Q(\sqrt{2E_b/N_0})\) depending on the definition of \(E_b\).
- For non-coherent envelope detection, performance is worse.
- ASK is generally the most susceptible to noise because information is encoded in the amplitude, which is directly affected by noise.
- FSK (Frequency Shift Keying):
- Coherent FSK: \(P_e = Q(\sqrt{E_b/N_0})\).
- Non-coherent FSK: \(P_e = \frac{1}{2}e^{-E_b/(2N_0)}\).
- Coherent FSK has similar performance to coherent ASK (OOK). Non-coherent FSK is worse than coherent FSK but can be better than non-coherent ASK.
- PSK (Phase Shift Keying) / BPSK (Binary PSK):
- For coherent BPSK, \(P_e = Q(\sqrt{2E_b/N_0})\).
- BPSK is generally more robust (lower \(P_e\) for a given \(E_b/N_0\)) than ASK and non-coherent FSK.
- QPSK (Quadrature Phase Shift Keying):
- For QPSK, the bit error rate (BER) can be similar to BPSK for the same \(E_b/N_0\), i.e., \(P_b \approx Q(\sqrt{2E_b/N_0})\), but it transmits two bits per symbol, making it more bandwidth efficient.
- Symbol error rate is higher, but bit error rate is comparable to BPSK.
General ranking from worst (highest \(P_e\)) to best (lowest \(P_e\)) for a given \(E_b/N_0\), using common coherent detection schemes:
- Non-coherent ASK/FSK > Coherent ASK (OOK) ≈ Coherent FSK > BPSK ≈ QPSK (BER)
Among the options typically implying coherent detection if not specified:
- ASK generally has the highest probability of error for a given \(E_b/N_0\) compared to PSK and FSK (coherent versions).
- QPSK (a form of PSK) offers good performance.
Therefore, ASK is the modulation scheme that usually gives the maximum probability of error among these choices under comparable conditions.
Final Answer:
ASK