In the context of Indian Constitutional law, President's Rule in a State under Article 356 of the Constitution of India is governed and interpreted by various judicial precedents. The landmark case that specifically addresses this issue is S.R. Bommai v. Union of India, AIR 1994 SC 1918.
Article 356 allows the President of India to take direct control of a state's machinery under certain conditions, often referred to as the imposition of President's Rule. The judgment in the case of S.R. Bommai v. Union of India is critical because it clarified circumstances under which such a rule could be applied and delimited the scope of misuse of Article 356.
Match List-I with List-II 
In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court of India hold that the Preamble is \(\textit{not}\) part of the Constitution?
| I. Arbitration of excepted matters | 1. A. Ayyasamy v. A. Paramasivam, (2016) 10 SCC 386 |
| II. Conditional Arbitration Clauses | 2. In re - Interplay between Arb Agreements and Stamp Act 2023 INSC 1066 |
| III. Separability of Arbitration Agreement - Kompetenz Kompetenz | 3. Vulcan Insurance Co Ltd v. Maharaj Singh and Anr (1976) 1 SCC 943 |
| IV. Arbitrability of fraud | 4. Mitra Guha Builders (India) Co v. ONGC (2020) 3 SCC 222 |
| Offenses | Sections |
| (A) Voyeurism | (1) Section 77 |
| (B) Word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman | (2) Section 79 |
| (C) Stalking | (3) Section 75 |
| (D) Sexual Harassment | (4) Section 78 |