Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This analogy has a nuanced relationship that goes beyond simple synonymy. It relates a specific type of something to the broader category.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
A VESTIGE is a trace or remnant of something that is disappearing or no longer exists. A REMAINDER is what is left over in general. Therefore, a vestige is a specific, often small or trace-like, type of remainder.
Now let's analyze the answer choices for this "specific, small type : general category" relationship:
\begin{itemize}
\item (A) figurine: statue - A figurine is specifically a small statue. This perfectly matches the relationship. A figurine is a small type of statue, just as a vestige is a small type of remainder.
\item (B) knife: cutlery - A knife is an item of cutlery, but the relationship isn't about size. This is "example : category".
\item (C) hub: wheel - A hub is the central part of a wheel. This is a "part : whole" relationship.
\item (D) angle: slope - These are related mathematical concepts, not a type-to-category relationship.
\item (E) inventory: goods - An inventory can be a list of goods or the collection of goods themselves. This is not a "small type : general category" relationship.
\end{itemize}
Step 3: Final Answer:
The pair "figurine: statue" has the same "small, specific type : general category" relationship as "vestige: remainder".