Question

Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, when can facts that are otherwise irrelevant be considered relevant?

• A. Only when they prove the guilt of the accused directly
• B. Only when they form part of a dying declaration
• C. When they are inconsistent with a fact in issue or relevant fact
• D. When they are part of an admission made in writing

Hint:

Always check Section 11 when dealing with “otherwise irrelevant” but contradictory facts.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is C

Step 1: Understanding relevance under the Evidence Act.
Sections 5 to 11 of the Indian Evidence Act explain when otherwise irrelevant facts may become relevant. Section 11 specifically deals with inconsistent facts.
Step 2: Application.
A fact that contradicts or makes improbable the existence of a fact in issue becomes relevant even if it would normally be irrelevant.
Step 3: Conclusion.
Facts inconsistent with facts in issue or relevant facts gain relevance under Section 11.