Question:
Under Art. 1 of the Constitution, India that is Bharat shall be
Under Art. 1 of the Constitution, India that is Bharat shall be
Show Hint
The exact wording of key constitutional articles is crucial. For Article 1, remember the precise phrase "Union of States" and the reasons for its preference over "Federation of States" — no agreement and no right to secede.
Updated On: Nov 1, 2025
- Federation of states
- Union of states
- Democratic republic
- Quasi federal
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is B
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
Article 1 of the Constitution of India defines the name and the nature of the Indian polity. It is the very first article and sets the foundational understanding of the country's structure.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Article 1(1) of the Constitution reads: "India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States."
The Constituent Assembly deliberately chose the term "Union of States" over "Federation of States". Dr. B.R. Ambedkar explained that the term "Union" was used to signify two important things:
\begin{enumerate} \item The Indian federation is not the result of an agreement among the states to join a federation. \item The states have no right to secede from the federation. The Union is indestructible. \end{enumerate} While India has a federal structure (with power divided between the Centre and States), the term used in the Constitution is 'Union of States'. The terms 'Democratic republic' describe the nature of the government as laid out in the Preamble, and 'Quasi-federal' is a description used by constitutional scholars to explain India's structure (federal in form but unitary in spirit), but it is not the term used in Article 1.
Step 3: Final Answer:
Article 1 of the Constitution explicitly declares that India shall be a "Union of states".
Article 1 of the Constitution of India defines the name and the nature of the Indian polity. It is the very first article and sets the foundational understanding of the country's structure.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Article 1(1) of the Constitution reads: "India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States."
The Constituent Assembly deliberately chose the term "Union of States" over "Federation of States". Dr. B.R. Ambedkar explained that the term "Union" was used to signify two important things:
\begin{enumerate} \item The Indian federation is not the result of an agreement among the states to join a federation. \item The states have no right to secede from the federation. The Union is indestructible. \end{enumerate} While India has a federal structure (with power divided between the Centre and States), the term used in the Constitution is 'Union of States'. The terms 'Democratic republic' describe the nature of the government as laid out in the Preamble, and 'Quasi-federal' is a description used by constitutional scholars to explain India's structure (federal in form but unitary in spirit), but it is not the term used in Article 1.
Step 3: Final Answer:
Article 1 of the Constitution explicitly declares that India shall be a "Union of states".
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top Questions on Constitutional Laws
- Match the following:
I. Chief Election Commissioner A. Elected by Rajya Sabha
II. Deputy Chairman of Rajya Sabha B. Elected by Members of Lok Sabha
III. Speaker of Lok Sabha C. Appointed by the President
IV. Chairman of Public Accounts Committee D. Appointed by the Speaker of Lok Sabha
- AILET LLM - 2026
- Legal Studies
- Constitutional Laws
- In which of the following cases, the concept of curative petition was evolved by the Supreme Court of India?
- AILET LLM - 2026
- Legal Studies
- Constitutional Laws
- Consider the following Assertion [A] and Reasoning [R]:
[A] The Supreme Court of India ordinarily does not interfere with order of acquittal passed by the High Court in the favor of accused.
[R] The power vested in the Court under Article 136 of the Constitution is plenary, hence the Court itself set the limits by permitting invocation of this power in very exceptional circumstances.
Choose the most suitable answer from the below given options.
- AILET LLM - 2026
- Legal Studies
- Constitutional Laws
- In which of the following cases has the Supreme Court of India directed the Central Government to constitute a National Tribunals Commission (NTC), an independent body to supervise the functioning of tribunals in India?
- AILET LLM - 2026
- Legal Studies
- Constitutional Laws
- In which of the landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India held that the principle of res judicata applies to a petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution if a similar petition, on the same cause of action, has already been dismissed on merits by a High Court under Article 226?
- AILET LLM - 2026
- Legal Studies
- Constitutional Laws
View More Questions
Questions Asked in AIBE exam
- In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court of India hold that the rule of nemo judex in causa sua is subject to the doctrine of necessity?
- AIBE - 2025
- Administrative Law
- According to the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, what is the fixed amount of compensation payable in the event of death caused by a motor vehicle accident under no-fault liability?
- AIBE - 2025
- General Law
- The grounds for decree for dissolution of marriage under Section 2 of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 are:
I. whereabouts of the husband have not been known for two years.
II. husband has been sentenced to imprisonment for a period of five years.
III. husband has failed to perform marital obligations for two years without reasonable cause.
IV. husband has neglected or failed to maintain his wife for one year.
Select the correct answer.- AIBE - 2025
- Family Laws
- Statement 1: Under the Indian Penal Code, if a person harbours an offender who has escaped custody for an offence punishable with imprisonment up to 3 years, he shall be punished with imprisonment up to 7 years.
Statement 2: The law provides an exception for harbouring or concealing by the husband or wife of the offender.- AIBE - 2025
- Indian Penal Code (IPC)
- A Statement is followed by two Conclusions, I and II.
Statement: According to the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, the Government credits ₹15,000 to the Rehabilitation Fund for each child or adolescent for whom fine has been recovered from the employer. This amount may be deposited or invested, and the interest is also payable to the child or adolescent.
Conclusions:
I. The child or adolescent is entitled not only to the credited amount but also to the interest accrued on it.
II. The Government is not required to deposit any money other than what is collected as fines from the employer.
Which one is correct?- AIBE - 2025
- Labour & Industrial Law
View More Questions