Step 1: Analyzing the flaw in the argument.
The Great Fakir criticizes the Magnificent Mystic's act for being "an obvious form of mechanical trickery" but does not focus on the effectiveness or creativity of the stage act. The flaw in reasoning lies in attacking the morality of the act rather than addressing the actual quality or efficacy of the performance.
Step 2: Analysis of options.
- (A) This is the correct answer, as the criticism targets the moral aspect of the act, rather than its practical effectiveness.
- (B) Popularity is not the primary focus of the argument.
- (C) The argument does not attack the credentials of the Great Fakir.
- (D) The distinction between types of mechanical trickery is not the flaw in the argument.
- (E) The argument does not suggest that both magicians' acts are the same; it focuses on a moral critique.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The correct answer is (A), as the argument focuses on attacking the morality of the Mystic's act rather than discussing its effectiveness.
Historian: The Russian Revolution in the early 20th century was sparked not by the proletariat, but by the bourgeoisie, or intellectual middle-class, a fact that is widely accepted in modern academia. The French Revolution of 1789 was also largely ignited by a rising middle class. The idea that political upheavals are initiated by the populist "peasant-class" is widely accepted as a fallacy today. Therefore, political commentators analyzing the "Arab Spring" movement in the past two years are inaccurate in suggesting that the movement is truly populist.
Which of the following best describes the flaw in the historian's argument?
If \(8x + 5x + 2x + 4x = 114\), then, \(5x + 3 = ?\)
If \(r = 5 z\) then \(15 z = 3 y,\) then \(r =\)