Comprehension

There is an essential and irreducible ‘duality’ in the normative conceptualization of an individ ual person. We can see the person in terms of his or her ‘agency’, recognizing and respecting his or her ability to form goals, commitments, values, etc., and we can also see the person in terms of his or her ‘well-being’. This dichotomy is lost in a model of exclusively self-interested motivation, in which a person’s agency must be entirely geared to his or her own well-being. But once that straitjacket of self-interested motivation is removed, it becomes possible to rec ognize the indisputable fact that the person’s agency can well be geared to considerations not covered- or at least not fully covered- by his or her own well-being. Agency may be seen as important (not just instrumentally for the pursuit of well-being, but also intrinsically), but that still leaves open the question as to how that agency is to be evaluated and appraised. 
Even though the use of one’s agency is a matter for oneself to judge, the need for careful assess ment of aims, objective, allegiances, etc., and the conception of the good, may be important and exacting. To recognize the distinction between the ‘agency aspect’ and the ‘well-being aspect’ of a person does not require us to take the view that the person’s success as an agent must be independent, or completely separable from, his or her success in terms of well-being. A person may well feel happier and better off as a result of achieving what he or she wanted to achieve- perhaps for his or her family, or community, or class, or party, or some other cause. Also it is quite possible that a person’s well-being will go down as a result of frustration if there is some failure to achieve what he or she wanted to achieve as an agent, even though those achievements are not directly concerned with his or her well-being.
There is really no sound basis for demanding that the agency aspect and the well-being aspect of a person should be independent of each other, and it is, I suppose, even possible that every change in one will affect the other as well. However, the point at issue is not the plausibility of their independence, but the sustainability and relevance of the distinction. The fact that two variables may be so related that one cannot change without the other, does not imply that they are the same variable, or that they will have the same values, or that the value of one can be obtained from the other on basis of some simple transformation. The importance of an agency achievement does not rest entirely on the enhancement of well-being that it may indirectly cause. The agency achievement and well-being achievement, both of which have some distinct importance, may be casually linked with each other, but this fact does not compromise the specific importance of either. In so far as utility-based welfare calculations concentrate only on the well-being of the person, ignoring the agency aspect, or actually fails to distinguish between the agency aspect and well-being aspect altogether, something of real importance is lost.

Question: 1

According to the ideas in the passage, the following are not true except:

Show Hint


When passages discuss “distinctions,” correct answers usually preserve the independence of concepts, while wrong ones overstate dependence/independence.
Updated On: Aug 30, 2025
  • The value of a person’s well-being cannot be obtained from the value of her agency.
  • A person’s agency aspect is independent of her well-being aspect.
  • A person’s agency is important because her well-being must depend on her agency.
  • A person’s agency must be entirely geared towards her own well-being.
  • A person’s well-being will be dependent on her agency in all circumstances.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: The passage distinguishes between two aspects of a person: \textit{agency} and \textit{well-being}. It states that these are distinct and cannot be reduced to one another.
Step 2: Option (A) aligns with this idea—it emphasizes that the value of well-being cannot be obtained merely from the value of agency.
Step 3: Options (B), (D), and (E) claim total independence or complete dependence, both of which are denied in the passage. Option (C) incorrectly assumes that agency’s importance is entirely due to well-being.
Step 4: Therefore, only (A) is consistent with the passage.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

In the case of Japan, there is a strong empirical evidence to suggest that systematic departure from self-interested behavior, in the direction of duty, loyalty and goodwill have played a substantial part in industrial success. Which of the following is closest to the ideas presented in the passage?

Show Hint


Look for the answer that reflects the key philosophical point of the passage—in this case, agency functioning beyond self-interest.
Updated On: Aug 30, 2025
  • Japanese are duty bound selfless people.
  • The sense of well-being of the Japanese people gets consistently enhanced due to this systematic departure from the self-interested behavior.
  • Had there been no enhancement of their own well-being, the Japanese people would have not been dutiful.
  • However the agency of the Japanese people in their industrial success is probably derived from factors beyond this sense of well-being.
  • Japanese people’s adherence to ethos of duty, loyalty and goodwill can well be explained within the paradigm of self-interested behavior.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: The passage emphasized that agency can exist beyond the pursuit of personal well-being.
Step 2: Japanese people’s success was due to duty, loyalty, and goodwill—factors not reducible to mere self-interest or individual well-being.
Step 3: Option (D) captures this best, showing agency functioning independently of well-being.
Step 4: Options (A), (B), (C), and (E) misinterpret by oversimplifying into self-interest or well-being dependence.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

Of the options presented below, which one is the best example for the ideas propounded in the passage?

Show Hint


In application questions, choose the example that shows the interplay of both agency (acting for causes) and well-being (personal/social benefit).
Updated On: Aug 30, 2025
  • ‘Change for Equality’ was a campaign by women of Iran to remove discrimination against women in their country. Activities of the movement were attacked and jailed by the government, but the campaign continued.
  • In January 2011, the Egyptian people came out against the regime to topple it. Their grievances included police atrocities, state emergency laws, lack of free election, and lack of freedom of speech, corruption, unemployment, food price inflation and low minimum wages.
  • A worker immolated himself to highlight injustice being perpetrated by the management against the employees in the company.
  • The factory workers carried on with the strike in demand for increased wages, even though they were not paid wages for the duration they were on strike.
  • A politician went on a hunger strike against corruption which not only galvanized the state government in enacting new laws, but also increased his image in the minds of the voters.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: The passage highlights that agency can be exercised both intrinsically and extrinsically, impacting not just well-being but also broader outcomes.
Step 2: Option (E) reflects this duality—the politician’s agency (hunger strike) pursued a collective goal (anti-corruption laws) and also enhanced personal standing (well-being).
Step 3: Other options illustrate protests or actions but don’t combine the dual role of agency and well-being as clearly.
Step 4: Hence, option (E) best matches the passage’s philosophical framework.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4

Read the sentences given below and choose the option that is best in accordance with the ideas in the passage.
I. There is a need to distinguish between the agency aspect and the well-being aspect of a person.
II. A person can be conceptualized in terms of either agency or well-being.
III. A person is important, not just instrumentally, for the pursuit of well-being.

Show Hint


When given multiple statements, eliminate those that oversimplify or contradict the nuanced balance in the passage.
Updated On: Aug 30, 2025
  • I only
  • II only
  • III only
  • I and III
  • II and III
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: The passage explicitly emphasizes distinguishing between agency and well-being, supporting statement I.
Step 2: It also highlights that agency has intrinsic importance, not just as an instrument for well-being, supporting statement III.
Step 3: Statement II is incorrect—the passage rejects the notion of choosing only one; both aspects must be recognized together.
Step 4: Hence, the correct choice is (D) I and III.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 5

The idea of agency, as used in the passage, is implied in all the options given below, except:

Show Hint


Agency in philosophy means intentional action with goals—eliminate choices that describe passive, non-instrumental activities.
Updated On: Aug 30, 2025
  • A student arguing for a grade revision
  • A lawyer arguing the case for his rich client
  • A politician on dharma to gain publicity
  • A hungry child crying for food
  • An ascetic praying for world peace
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Agency refers to intentional, purposive action directed at achieving goals.
Step 2: Options (A), (B), (C), and (D) all involve deliberate goal-directed action tied to agency.
Step 3: Option (E) involves praying, which does not reflect agency in the passage’s sense—it is neither goal-directed in practical action nor evaluable in terms of agency vs well-being distinction.
Step 4: Therefore, (E) is the exception.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions

Questions Asked in XAT exam

View More Questions