Question:

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by 3 arguments numbered I, II and III. You should decide which of the arguments is/are 'strong' argument(s) and which is/are 'weak' argument(s) and accordingly choose your answer from given options.
Statement:
Should religion be taught in schools?
Arguments:
I. No, ours is a secular state.
II. Yes, teaching religion helps inculcate moral values among children.
III. No, how can one dream of such a step when we want the young generation to fulfill its role in the 21st century.

Updated On: Dec 23, 2025
  • All are strong
  • Only I is strong
  • Only II is strong
  • Only I and III are strong
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

The question requires evaluating the strength of three arguments regarding whether religion should be taught in schools. Let's analyze each argument:

  1. Argument I: No, ours is a secular state.
    • This argument is based on the principle of secularism, which suggests that religious teachings should not be part of publicly funded institutions like schools. However, this is not a strong argument by itself, as secularism can coexist with cultural education. Therefore, Argument I is weak.
  2. Argument II: Yes, teaching religion helps inculcate moral values among children.
    • This argument focuses on the potential benefits of religious education, such as developing moral values and ethical understanding in students. Given that moral education is often valued in educational systems, this argument effectively supports the notion of teaching religion. Hence, Argument II is strong.
  3. Argument III: No, how can one dream of such a step when we want the young generation to fulfill its role in the 21st century.
    • This argument contends that focusing on modern educational needs and global challenges might be hindered by teaching religion. However, it lacks direct evidence or reasoning against why religious teachings would prevent future readiness. It appears more rhetorical than fact-based, thus Argument III is weak.

After evaluating each argument, the strongest and most well-justified argument is Argument II. Hence, the correct answer is Only II is strong.

Was this answer helpful?
0
1

Top Questions on Statements and Arguments

View More Questions