Question:

The question consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Statement
Arguments I : Women should be allowed to go out alone.
Arguments II : Yes. It would make them independent and safe.
Arguments III : No. They are under the protection of their male affines and they should be with them always A. Only argument I is strong
B. Only argument II is strong
C. Both arguments I and II are strong
D. Both arguments I and II are weak
Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below :

Updated On: Dec 30, 2025
  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

To determine which of the arguments is strong, let's analyze each argument in the context of societal norms and logical reasoning.

  1. Argument I: "Women should be allowed to go out alone." This statement suggests that women should have the freedom and autonomy to be independent without needing a companion. It implies an idea of equality and modern social norms promoting gender equality. However, the argument doesn't present supporting evidence or rationale beyond stating this freedom should be allowed.
  2. Argument II: "Yes. It would make them independent and safe." This argument supports the notion of independence but lacks strong reasoning. It mentions independence and perceived safety by being alone, but it doesn't address specific benefits or counter any societal or cultural concerns robustly.
  3. Argument III: "No. They are under the protection of their male affines and they should be with them always." This argument is based on a traditional view that women require male protection. It lacks a contemporary understanding and is not a logically strong argument in today's context aiming for gender equality.

Comparing these arguments, none present a compelling reasoning with adequate evidence or logic in the current social context. Therefore, neither argument is strong enough to be considered accurately backed by reasoning or facts.

Conclusion: Option D is correct, as both arguments I and II are considered weak for the given statement in a modern setting encouraging gender equality and independence.

Was this answer helpful?
2
1

Top Questions on Syllogism

View More Questions