Step 1: Understanding the Question.
The maxim "Ubi jus ibi idem remedium" means that where there is a right, there must be a remedy. This principle was recognized in the case of Ashby V. White.
Step 2: Analysis of Options.
- (A) Winterbottom V. Wright: This case is related to the principle of privity of contract and does not involve the maxim in question.
- (B) Chapman V. Pickersgill: This case is not related to the maxim "Ubi jus ibi idem remedium."
- (C) Ashby V. White: This case is where the principle was recognized. It involved a denial of the right to vote and the court emphasized that there must be a remedy for every legal right.
- (D) Rylands V. Fletcher: This case is related to the rule of strict liability in tort law.
Step 3: Conclusion.
Thus, the correct answer is (C) Ashby V. White, as the maxim was established in this case.