Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
Section 159 of the Cr.PC provides a mechanism for a Magistrate to ensure that a proper investigation is conducted. It outlines the powers a Magistrate can exercise upon receiving a police report under Section 157.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Section 157 Cr.PC requires the police to send a report to the Magistrate forthwith upon receiving information about a cognizable offence. In this report, the police may state that they will investigate the case, or under the proviso to Section 157(1), they may decide not to investigate if the case is not serious or there are insufficient grounds.
It is upon receiving such a report that Section 159 comes into play. Section 159 states:
"Such Magistrate, on receiving such a report, may direct an investigation, or, if he thinks fit, at once proceed, or depute any Magistrate subordinate to him to proceed, to hold a preliminary inquiry into the case, or otherwise to dispose of the case in the manner provided in this Code."
This power is a check on the police's discretion not to investigate. The Magistrate can order the police to investigate even if they have decided not to. The power is exercised after the police have made their initial decision and sent their report, specifically in cases where they choose not to proceed. It is not a power to be used while an investigation is already in progress.
Step 3: Final Answer:
The power under Section 159 Cr.PC is exercised by a Magistrate when he receives a report from the police, particularly when the police have decided not to investigate the case.
Having heard the learned Counsels for the parties, and on perusal of the ma terial on record, the primary issue which arises for consideration of this Court is ”whether a review or recall of an order passed in a criminal proceeding initiated under section 340 of CrPC is permissible or not?” [...] A careful consideration of the statutory provisions and the aforesaid decisions of this Court clarify the now-well settled position of jurisprudence of Section 362 of CrPC which when summarized would be that the criminal courts, as envisaged under the CrPC, are barred from altering or reviewing in their own judgments except for the exceptions which are explicitly provided by the statute, namely, correction of a clerical or an arithmetical error that might have been committed or the said power is provided under any other law for the time being in force. As the courts become functus officio the very moment a judgment or an order is signed, the bar of Section 362 CrPC becomes applicable. Despite the powers provided under Section 482 CrPC which, this veil cannot allow the courts to step beyond or circumvent an explicit bar. It also stands clarified that it is only in situations wherein an application for recall of an order or judgment seeking a procedural review that the bar would not apply and not a substantive review where the bar as contained in Section 362 CrPC is attracted. Numerous decisions of this Court have also elaborated that the bar under said provision is to be applied stricto sensu.
(Extracted with edits and revisions from Vikram Bakshi v. RP Khosla 2025 INSC 1020)