The new policy was intended to --- the company’s operations, but it ended up --- many of the existing processes.
Step 1: Understanding the sentence.
The structure “intended to … but ended up …” signals contrast — the first action describes the intended positive goal, and the second describes the opposite or unintended negative result.
Step 2: Evaluating the first blank.
The new policy was intended to improve operations. Words like “streamline,” “simplify,” or “enhance” fit this intention because they convey efficiency or improvement.
(A) streamline — means to make more efficient or effective; fits perfectly.
(C) simplify — similar in meaning, but less formal than “streamline.”
(F) enhance — means to improve, but doesn’t directly relate to operations flow as strongly as “streamline.”
Step 3: Evaluating the second blank.
The second clause describes an unintended negative outcome — the policy ended up making things worse.
(B) complicate — means to make more difficult; fits the negative effect perfectly.
(D) burden — means to overload, but doesn’t fit as precisely with “processes.”
Step 4: Conclusion.
The contrast between “streamline” (make smoother) and “complicate” (make more difficult) clearly expresses how the policy backfired.
Final Answer: (A) streamline and (B) complicate
After running around the city all day delivering invitations for the wedding I desperately needed to hit the sack. (Identify the meaning of the underlined phrase)