This sentence describes two contrasting reactions to the new environmental policy:
- The first blank requires a positive response from environmentalists who appreciate the policy’s ambitious goals and potential benefits. Words such as \textit{“commended”} ((A), \textit{“praised”} ((B), \textit{“lauded”} ((D), and \textit{“supported”} (E) all convey approval. Among these, \textit{“commended”} fits well as a formal recognition of the policy's merit.
- The second blank introduces a negative reaction from some businesses worried about economic consequences. Appropriate words include \textit{“criticized”} ((C) and \textit{“challenged”} (F). \textit{“Criticized”} clearly conveys disapproval or objection, which is suitable here.
Detailed reasoning:
- (A) commended — implies formal praise and approval, suitable for environmentalists who support the policy.
- (C) criticized — implies objections or negative feedback, fitting the perspective of concerned businesses.
Other Option:
- \textit{“Praised”} and \textit{“lauded”} are also positive but might be considered a bit more enthusiastic or celebratory than “commended.”
- \textit{“Supported”} is positive but less formal than “commended” and may be less precise in this context.
- \textit{“Challenged”} implies contesting or questioning the policy’s validity or implementation, which is also reasonable but “criticized” is a more direct expression of concern.
Correct Pair:
- (A) commended (positive)
- (C) criticized (negative)