The historian’s account was ---, offering a --- interpretation of the events that shaped the era.
Step 1: Understanding the context.
The sentence praises the historian’s account and interpretation of events. Since the tone is positive, both blanks should describe fairness, neutrality, and accuracy — essential traits of good historical writing.
Step 2: Evaluating each option.
(A) controversial — means likely to cause disagreement; doesn’t fit the balanced tone.
(B) biased — means unfairly favoring one side; opposite of neutrality.
(C) objective — means impartial or fact-based; fits perfectly.
(D) subjective — means based on personal opinion; not appropriate for a fair account.
(E) balanced — means considering all sides fairly; matches the idea of even-handed interpretation.
(F) partial — means favoring one side; opposite of “balanced.”
Step 3: Conclusion.
The best combination is “objective” and “balanced,” as they describe a historian’s work that fairly analyzes multiple viewpoints without bias.
Final Answer: (C) objective and (E) balanced
After running around the city all day delivering invitations for the wedding I desperately needed to hit the sack. (Identify the meaning of the underlined phrase)