Question

The following question consists of a statement and two arguments I and II. Choose the best option.
Statement : Should India make efforts to harness solar energy to fulfill its energy requirements?
Arguments : I. Yes. Most of the energy sources used at present are exhaustible.
II. No. Harnessing solar energy requires a lot of capital, which India lacks in.

• A. Only Argument I is strong
• B. Only Argument II is strong
• C. Neither Argument I nor II is strong
• D. Both Arguments I and II are strong

Hint:

Arguments based on sustainability, future environmental survival, or logical necessity are usually "Strong." Arguments based on "lack of money" or "difficulty of implementation" are usually considered "Weak" because they don't address whether the goal is desirable.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is A

Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
A strong argument must be a reason that is important and directly related to the issue in the statement. A weak argument is either irrelevant or of minor consequence.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
1. Analysis of Argument I: Most current energy sources (coal, petroleum) are non-renewable and are depleting fast. Switching to solar (a renewable source) is a logical and necessary step for long-term energy security. This is a crucial and factual reason. Hence, Argument I is strong.
2. Analysis of Argument II: While solar infrastructure does require high initial capital, stating that India "lacks" capital to the point of not making the effort is a weak reason. Budgetary constraints are hurdles to be managed (via foreign investment, loans, or subsidies), not a definitive reason to abandon a vital transition. Hence, Argument II is weak.
Step 3: Final Answer:
Only Argument I provides a strong, logical reason for the action mentioned in the statement.