Question

The following question consists of a statement and argument I and II. Choose the best option.
Statement: Should judiciary be independent of the executive.
Arguments: 1. Yes, this would help curb the unlawful activities of the executive.
2. No, the executive would not be able to take bold measures.

• A. Only argument I is strong
• B. Only argument II is strong
• C. Neither argument I nor argument II is strong
• D. Both arguments I and II are strong

Answer 1

The Correct Option is A

To determine whether the judiciary should be independent of the executive, let's analyze the given arguments:

1. Argument 1: "Yes, this would help curb the unlawful activities of the executive."
   • This argument is strong because an independent judiciary can provide checks and balances on the executive's power, ensuring that they do not overstep or engage in unlawful activities. The judiciary plays a critical role in upholding the law, and its independence is fundamental to preventing abuse of power by the executive.
2. Argument 2: "No, the executive would not be able to take bold measures."
   • This argument is weaker because it assumes that the presence of an independent judiciary completely inhibits the executive's ability to act decisively. However, the judiciary does not stop the executive from taking bold actions that are within the legal framework. The judiciary's role is to ensure legality and constitutionality, not to obstruct necessary executive actions.

After reviewing both arguments, only argument I is strong as it highlights the necessity of an independent judiciary in maintaining the rule of law and preventing unauthorized actions by the executive branch. Therefore, the correct option is "Only argument I is strong".