The CEO’s --- approach to the company’s challenges was a stark contrast to the previous leader’s --- tactics.
Step 1: Understanding the sentence.
The sentence uses the phrase “a stark contrast,” which means the two leaders’ approaches were very different. The new CEO’s approach is described positively, implying creativity and modern thinking, while the previous leader’s methods were traditional or cautious.
Step 2: Evaluating each option.
(A) innovative — means creative or introducing new ideas; fits well for the new CEO’s approach.
(B) cautious — means careful or hesitant; doesn’t provide a strong contrast to “innovative.”
(C) aggressive — means forceful or bold; not necessarily the intended contrast here.
(D) progressive — means forward-thinking, similar to “innovative,” but we need a contrasting pair.
(E) conservative — means traditional or resistant to change; the perfect opposite of “innovative.”
(F) passive — means inactive or unassertive; not a strong fit with the context of leadership tactics.
Step 3: Conclusion.
The best contrast is between “innovative” (new and creative approach) and “conservative” (traditional and resistant to change), effectively showing the difference between the two leaders.
Courage : Bravery :: Yearning :
Select the most appropriate option to complete the analogy.
The CEO’s decision to downsize the workforce was considered myopic because it sacrificed long-term stability to accommodate
short-term gains.
Select the most appropriate option that can replace the word “myopic” without changing the meaning of the sentence.