Question

The case Krishna Gopal V/s State of MP relates to

• A. Water pollution
• B. Air and water pollution
• C. Noise and air pollution
• D. Water and noise pollution

Hint:

For landmark environmental law cases, try to remember the type of pollution and the principle laid down. For example, M.C. Mehta cases (multiple, on Ganga pollution, Taj Trapezium, Oleum Gas Leak - absolute liability), Vellore Citizens' Welfare Forum (Precautionary Principle, Polluter Pays Principle), and Krishna Gopal (Noise/Air Pollution).

Answer 1

The Correct Option is C

Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
Landmark cases in environmental law have been instrumental in shaping the legal framework for pollution control in India. The case of Krishna Gopal v. State of M.P. is one such case, particularly noted for its stance on pollution.

Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The case of Krishna Gopal v. State of M.P., 1986 dealt with the issue of pollution caused by a chemical factory. The petitioner complained about the nuisance caused by the factory's emissions and noise. The Madhya Pradesh High Court in this case took a strong stance against pollution. While the case is very famous for its observations on noise pollution, it also involved complaints related to air pollution from the factory's emissions.
The court recognized that pollution which is a public nuisance is a punishable offence and that citizens have a right to a clean environment. Given that the factory's operations involved both noise and emissions, the most comprehensive and accurate description among the options is "Noise and air pollution". While primarily cited for noise, the factual matrix included air pollution as well.

Step 3: Final Answer:
The case of Krishna Gopal V/s State of MP relates to both noise and air pollution caused by industrial activity.