Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The question asks about the subject matter of the landmark Supreme Court case, S. R. Bommai v. Union of India.
Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
The case of S. R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) is a seminal judgment in Indian constitutional law that laid down guidelines to prevent the misuse of Article 356 of the Constitution of India. Article 356 deals with the imposition of President's Rule in a state. The Supreme Court held that the power of the President to dismiss a state government is not absolute. The verdict established that the President's proclamation imposing President's Rule is subject to judicial review. The Court also held that the test of a government's majority should be on the floor of the Legislative Assembly and not based on the subjective opinion of the Governor.
- Option (B) relates to Habeas Corpus petitions.
- Option (C) relates to environmental law cases, such as those filed by M.C. Mehta.
Step 4: Final Answer:
The Supreme Court's decision in S. R. Bommai v. Union of India was related to the imposition of President's Rule in a state under Article 356.
Match List-I with List-II 