Question:

Some philosophers endorse views according to which there are abstract objects such as numbers, or Universals. (Universals are properties that can be instantiated by multiple objects, such as redness or squareness.) Abstract objects are generally regarded as being outside of space and time, and/or as being causally inert. Mathematical objects, fictional entities and worlds are often given as examples of abstract objects. The view that there really are no abstract objects is called nominalism. Realism about such objects is exemplified by Platonism.

Show Hint

Look for endings that continue the logical structure already established in the paragraph.
Updated On: Nov 24, 2025
  • Other positions include moderate realism and conceptualism.
  • These are not mere theories.
  • They are attempts to find some meaning in the Universal chaos.
  • Indian philosophy has a different take on this.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the paragraph.
The paragraph explains two opposing philosophical positions: nominalism and Platonism. The concluding sentence should logically expand on this philosophical classification.
Step 2: Evaluating the options.
(A) Correct — It continues the taxonomy by listing additional related positions, completing the philosophical overview.
(B) Vague and irrelevant.
(C) Incorrect — introduces emotional language unrelated to philosophy.
(D) Too abrupt and unrelated to the logical progression of the paragraph.
Step 3: Conclusion.
Option (A) logically extends the discussion by adding more philosophical categories.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0