Question

Should all the factories in the cities be shifted to outskirts far away from the main city?
Arguments:
I. Yes, this is essential step for controlling pollution in the city.
II. No, such a step will lead to lot of inconvenience to the employees of the factories and their families as well.

• A. If only argument I is strong.
• B. If only II is strong.
• C. If neither I nor II is strong.
• D. If both I and II are strong.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is A

To solve this question, we need to evaluate the strength of the arguments regarding whether factories should be shifted to the outskirts of a city.

1. Understanding Argument I: "Yes, this is an essential step for controlling pollution in the city."
   • This argument is strong because it addresses the major issue of pollution in city areas. Industrial activities are significant contributors to air, water, and noise pollution. By relocating factories to the outskirts, the negative environmental impact on densely populated areas can be reduced.
   • Reducing pollution has a positive impact on public health and the overall livability of the city, justifying this argument’s strength.
2. Understanding Argument II: "No, such a step will lead to a lot of inconvenience to the employees of the factories and their families as well."
   • This argument considers the practical aspect of the relocation. Employees and their families might find it inconvenient to travel greater distances daily.
   • However, this inconvenience, though significant, is generally considered a lesser issue compared to the larger environmental and health benefits. Adaptations like transportation facilitation or housing schemes can mitigate such inconveniences over time.

Considering the above points, Argument I presents a more compelling and impactful reason (environmental and public health improvement) than Argument II (inconvenience of relocation), which is more circumstantial and potentially temporary. Therefore, the stronger argument is:

If only argument I is strong.