Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The Indian Penal Code dedicates a chapter to offences relating to documents and property marks, which includes the crime of forgery.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Section 463 of the IPC provides the definition of "Forgery". It states:
"Whoever makes any false document or false electronic record or part of a document or electronic record, with intent to cause damage or injury, to the public or to any person, or to support any claim or title, or to cause any person to part with property, or to enter into any express or implied contract, or with intent to commit fraud or that fraud may be committed, commits forgery."
Let's look at the other options:
- House-breaking is defined in Section 445.
- Dishonest misappropriation of property is defined in Section 403.
- "Forgery with cheating" is not a defined term, although forgery is often committed for the purpose of cheating (defined in Section 415). The offence of "Forgery for purpose of cheating" is punished under Section 468.
Section 463 itself only defines the basic crime of forgery.
Step 3: Final Answer:
Section 463 of the Indian Penal Code defines the crime of Forgery.
A glance over all the Sections related to extortion would reveal a clear distinction being carried out between the actual commission of extortion and the process of putting a person in fear for the purpose of committing extortion. Section 383 defines extortion, the punishment therefor is given in Section 384. Sections 386 and 388 provide for an aggravated form of extortion. These sections deal with the actual commission of an act of extortion, whereas Sections 385, 387 and 389 IPC seek to punish for an act committed for the purpose of extortion even though the act of extortion may not be complete and property not delivered. It is in the process of committing an offence that a person is put in fear of injury, death or grievous hurt. Section 387 IPC provides for a stage prior to committing extortion, which is putting a person in fear of death or grievous hurt ’in order to commit extortion’, similar to Section 385 IPC. Hence, Section 387 IPC is an aggravated form of 385 IPC, not 384 IPC. Having deliberated upon the offence of extortion and its forms, we proceed to analyze the essentials of both Sections, i.e.,383 and 387 IPC, the High Court dealt with.
(Extracted from Balaji Traders v. State of UP, 2025 INSC 806)