Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The question asks for the landmark Supreme Court judgment whose guidelines led to the insertion of Section 41-B into the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). This section deals with the procedure of arrest and the duties of the arresting officer.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
In the historic case of D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1997 SC 610, the Supreme Court expressed deep concern over custodial violence and deaths. To curb such abuses of power, the Court issued a set of 11 mandatory guidelines to be followed by the police during arrest and detention. These guidelines included requirements like the arresting officer bearing clear identification, preparing a memo of arrest attested by a witness, informing a friend or relative of the arrested person, and informing the arrested person of their rights.
To give statutory backing to these judicial directives, the Parliament amended the CrPC in 2008 (effective from 2009) and inserted several new provisions, including Section 41-B, which is titled "Procedure of arrest and duties of officer making arrest." This section codifies many of the guidelines laid down in the \textit{D.K. Basu} case.
- \textit{Nandini Satpati} deals with the right against self-incrimination (Article 20(3)).
- \textit{Sunil Batra} and \textit{Prem Shankar Shukla} deal with prisoners' rights and handcuffing.
Step 3: Final Answer:
Section 41-B was incorporated on the basis of the decision in D.K.Basu v. State of West Bengal.