To answer this, let's look at the line graph. The FSI is represented by the dotted line. We need to add up the FSI values for each year from 1994 to 2002.
* 1994: 40 ('000 hectares) = 40,000 hectares
* 1995: 70 ('000 hectares) = 70,000 hectares
* 1996: 60 ('000 hectares) = 60,000 hectares
* 1997: 90 ('000 hectares) = 90,000 hectares
* 1998: 110 ('000 hectares) = 110,000 hectares
* 1999: 140 ('000 hectares) = 140,000 hectares
* 2000: 120 ('000 hectares) = 120,000 hectares
* 2001: 150 ('000 hectares) = 150,000 hectares
* 2002: 120 ('000 hectares) = 120,000 hectares
Total FSI = 40,000 + 70,000 + 60,000 + 90,000 + 110,000 + 140,000 + 120,000 + 150,000 + 120,000
Total FSI = 900,000 hectares
The correct option is (D) : 9,00,000
Now, we need to compare FNI and FSI values for each consecutive year and see how many times FNI decreased while FSI increased.
* 1994 to 1995: FNI increased, FSI increased
* 1995 to 1996: FNI decreased, FSI decreased
* 1996 to 1997: FNI increased, FSI increased
* 1997 to 1998: FNI increased, FSI increased
* 1998 to 1999: FNI decreased, FSI increased
* 1999 to 2000: FNI decreased, FSI decreased
* 2000 to 2001: FNI increased, FSI increased
* 2001 to 2002: FNI decreased, FSI decreased
So, there is only 2 such year.
The correct option is (A) : 2
We need to look at the pie charts for FNI in 1994, 1996, and 2002 and compare the proportion of commercial use in each.
* 1994: Commercial = 3,000 hectares / (3,000 + 2,000 + 1,000 + 20,000 + 30,000)
* 1994: Commercial = 3,000 / 56,000 = 0.0535 = 5.35%
* 1996: Commercial = 5,000 hectares / (5,000 + 6,000 + 3,000 + 20,000 + 15,000)
* 1996: Commercial = 5,000 / 49,000 = 0.102 = 10.2%
* 2002: Commercial = 9,000 hectares / (9,000 + 35,000 + 10,000 + 5,000 + 1,000)
* 2002: Commercial = 9,000 / 60,000 = 0.15 = 15%
The greatest proportion of FNI was put to commercial use in 2002.
The correct option is (D) : 2002