Step 1: Context.
The University Grants Commission (UGC) had issued a criterion allowing relaxation in qualifying marks for reserved categories in certain examinations.
Step 2: Challenge before Kerala High Court.
The Nair Service Society challenged this relaxation policy, arguing that it discriminated and violated the principle of equality under Article 16(1) of the Constitution.
Step 3: Court's ruling.
The Kerala High Court, in Nair Service Society Vs UGC ; WP(C) No. 5190 of 2016, held that such relaxation was unconstitutional as it went beyond permissible limits of affirmative action.
Step 4: Conclusion.
Thus, the correct case is (A).
Match List-I with List-II 