Question:

Recently, in which case the Kerala High Court held that a University Grant Commission criterion which allowed certain relaxation in marks to reserved categories as violation of Article 16(1) of the Constitution

Show Hint

Article 16(1) ensures equality of opportunity in public employment; any policy violating this may be struck down by courts.
Updated On: Nov 1, 2025
  • Nair Service Society Vs UGC ; WP(C) No. 5190 of 2016 (W)
  • CBSE Vs UGC ; WP(C) No. 5190 of 2016 (W)
  • UGC Vs State Of Kerala ; WP(C) No. 5190 of 2016 (W)
  • UGC Vs Secretary of State ; WP(C) No. 5190 of 2016 (W)
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Context.
The University Grants Commission (UGC) had issued a criterion allowing relaxation in qualifying marks for reserved categories in certain examinations.

Step 2: Challenge before Kerala High Court.
The Nair Service Society challenged this relaxation policy, arguing that it discriminated and violated the principle of equality under Article 16(1) of the Constitution.

Step 3: Court's ruling.
The Kerala High Court, in Nair Service Society Vs UGC ; WP(C) No. 5190 of 2016, held that such relaxation was unconstitutional as it went beyond permissible limits of affirmative action.

Step 4: Conclusion.
Thus, the correct case is (A).

Was this answer helpful?
0
0