Comprehension

Recently, a team of social scientists launched an experiment to test that hypothesis. They recruited 1,500 entrepreneurs in West Africa—a mix of women and men in their 30s, 40s, and 50s—who were running small startups in manufacturing, service, and commerce. They randomly assigned the founders to one of three groups. One was a control group: they went about their business as usual. The other two were training groups: they spent a week learning new concepts, analyzing them in case studies of other entrepreneurs, and applying them to their own startups through role-play and re section exercises. What differed was whether the training focused on cognitive skills or character skills. In cognitive skills training, the founders took an accredited business course created by the International Finance Corporation. They studied nance, accounting, HR, marketing, and pricing,  and practiced using what they learned to solve challenges and seize opportunities. In character skills training, the founders attended a class designed by psychologists to teach personal initiative. They studied proactivity, discipline, and determination, and practiced putting those qualities into action. Character skills training had a dramatic impact. After founders had spent merely ve days working on these skills, their rms’ pro ts grew by an average of 30 percent over the next two years. That was nearly triple the bene t of training in cognitive skills. Finance and marketing knowledge might have equipped founders to capitalize on opportunities, but studying proactivity and discipline enabled them to generate opportunities. They learned to anticipate market changes rather than react to them. They developed more creative ideas and introduced more new products. When they encountered nancial obstacles, instead of giving up, they were more resilient and resourceful in seeking loans. Along with demonstrating that character skills can propel us to achieve greater things, this evidence reveals that it’s never too late to build them … Character doesn’t set like plaster—it retains its plasticity. Character is often confused with personality, but they’re not the same. Personality is your predisposition—your basic instincts for how to think, feel, and act. Character is your capacity to prioritize your values over your instincts. Knowing your principles doesn’t necessarily mean you know how to practice them, particularly under stress or pressure. It’s easy to be proactive and determined when things are going well. The true test of character is whether you manage to stand by those values when the deck is stacked against you. If personality is how you respond on a typical day, character is how you show up on a hard day. Personality is not your destiny—it’s your tendency. Character skills enable you to transcend that tendency to be true to your principles. It’s not about the traits you have—it’s what you decide to do with them. Wherever you are today, there’s no reason why you can’t grow your character skills starting now.

Question: 1

Which of the following views would the author BEST agree with?

Show Hint

Always note subtle contrasts (here, personality vs character). Character represents principles in action, especially under stress.
Updated On: Dec 17, 2025
  • Character skills risk abandoning your personality along with your instincts.
  • Our values and principles are always put to test by our personality.
  • Putting our values and principles to practice requires transcending our personality.
  • Because principles clash with your personality, character is needed.
  • Our behavior is a function of our character not our personality.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Approach Solution - 1

To solve this question, we need to analyze the given comprehension and identify which statement the author would most likely agree with regarding character and personality.

  1. Understanding the Passage: The passage emphasizes the importance of character skills over personality traits. It illustrates an experiment where character skills training resulted in a significant improvement in entrepreneurs' business outcomes compared to cognitive skills training. The key point is that character allows individuals to prioritize values over instincts and transcend personality tendencies, particularly under challenging circumstances.
  2. Analyzing Each Option:
    • Character skills risk abandoning your personality along with your instincts.
      This option contradicts the passage since it suggests a negative impact of character skills, whereas the passage highlights their positive role.
    • Our values and principles are always put to test by our personality.
      While personality may influence our instincts, the passage does not stress that it constantly tests values and principles, rather it distinguishes between the responses dictated by personality and those guided by character.
    • Putting our values and principles to practice requires transcending our personality.
      This option is aligned with the passage's core message, which stresses that character skills help overcome inherent personality tendencies to uphold values.
    • Because principles clash with your personality, character is needed.
      Although this suggests a conflict between principles and personality, it's not entirely the passage's focus. The passage highlights transcending tendencies, not just conflict.
    • Our behavior is a function of our character not our personality.
      This oversimplifies the relationship between personality and character. The passage acknowledges both influence behavior but emphasizes character's role in challenging times.
  3. Conclusion: The correct answer is
    Putting our values and principles to practice requires transcending our personality.
    This statement best summarizes the passage's argument that character skills enable individuals to act consistently with their values, beyond personality inclinations.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution -2

Step 1: Recall the passage’s distinction.
The passage explained that personality is our predisposition (instincts, reactions), while character is our ability to transcend those instincts and act according to values and principles.
Step 2: Evaluate options.
- Option A: Incorrect — character does not abandon personality. - Option B: Misleading — values are not “tested by” personality, they override it. - Option C: Correct. The author stresses character as transcending personality by prioritizing values and principles. - Option D: Incorrect framing — principles do not “clash,” but require practice beyond personality. - Option E: Too absolute — behavior is influenced by both character and personality.
Step 3: Conclusion.
Thus, the best view is Option C.
Final Answer: \[ \boxed{\text{C}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

Which of the following can be BEST inferred from the passage?

Show Hint

Look for “BEST inferred” by connecting experimental evidence (profit growth, resilience) to broader life success.
Updated On: Dec 17, 2025
  • Character skills can compensate for poor cognitive skills.
  • Character skills can be built only if one believes in them.
  • Cognitive skills unlike character skills are always reactive.
  • Being aware of your character skills enable you to exercise them.
  • Sustainable success in life requires strong character skills.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is

Approach Solution - 1

This question asks you to determine which option can be best inferred from the given passage about the impact of character skills training versus cognitive skills training. Let us analyze each option carefully to identify the best inference based on the passage's information.

  1. Character skills can compensate for poor cognitive skills.
    • This statement implies that character skills can replace cognitive skills, which is not explicitly supported by the passage. The passage highlights the distinct advantages of character skills training over cognitive skills training but does not suggest that character skills can completely replace cognitive skills. Thus, this is not the best inference.
  2. Character skills can be built only if one believes in them.
    • The passage mentions that character skills can be developed and has plasticity. However, it does not state that belief in character skills is a prerequisite for building them. Therefore, this option is incorrect.
  3. Cognitive skills unlike character skills are always reactive.
    • The passage notes that character skills enable anticipation of market changes, implying proactivity, but it does not claim that cognitive skills are always reactive. It merely highlights one specific case where character skills training led to more proactive behavior. Thus, this inference is not fully supported.
  4. Being aware of your character skills enables you to exercise them.
    • While the passage emphasizes the importance of practicing character skills, it does not specifically state that merely being aware of these skills enables one to exercise them effectively. Therefore, this option is not the best choice.
  5. Sustainable success in life requires strong character skills.
    • The passage provides examples of businesses achieving significant growth through character skills training, including increased profits and resilience. It also emphasizes that character skills are needed to stand by values under stress and pressure. These points strongly suggest that character skills contribute to sustainable success. Thus, this is the best inference from the passage.

Considering all the options and the context provided in the passage, the correct answer is: "Sustainable success in life requires strong character skills."

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution -2

Step 1: Recall experimental findings.
The experiment showed that entrepreneurs who trained in character skills saw profit growth nearly triple that of those trained in cognitive skills.
Step 2: Evaluate options.
- Option A: Not stated — character skills don’t “compensate” but enhance opportunities. - Option B: Incorrect — belief is not emphasized, practice is. - Option C: Wrong — cognitive skills are not described as “always reactive.” - Option D: Awareness is not enough; deliberate practice is stressed. - Option E: Correct. The passage shows long-term business growth came from character skills, proving sustainability.
Step 3: Conclusion.
Thus, the inference is Option E.
Final Answer: \[ \boxed{\text{E}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

Based on the passage, why would character skills help entrepreneurs more than cognitive skills?

Show Hint

When RC contrasts two skill types, note the distinction: cognitive = capitalize, character = generate. That’s the key differentiator.
Updated On: Dec 17, 2025
  • One can be poor in finance and quantitative skills but really good in character skills.
  • Character skills enable you to generate opportunities rather than capitalize on existing ones.
  • Character skills are industry agnostic in application.
  • Entrepreneurs are already aware of their business and are only missing character skills.
  • Character skills prepare you for an uncertain future.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Approach Solution - 1

To understand why character skills might help entrepreneurs more than cognitive skills, let's start by analyzing the passage provided in the comprehension section.

  1. Context of the Experiment: A team conducted an experiment with 1,500 entrepreneurs in West Africa, focusing on comparing the effects of cognitive and character skills training. Cognitive skills included areas such as finance, accounting, HR, and marketing. In contrast, character skills focused on personal initiative, proactivity, discipline, and determination.
  2. Outcome of the Experiment: The results showed that character skills training led to a profit growth of 30% over two years, nearly triple the impact of cognitive skills training. This indicated a substantial benefit in developing character skills.
  3. Generating Opportunities vs. Capitalizing on Them: While cognitive skills might equip founders to capitalize on existing opportunities, character skills enabled them to generate new opportunities. This highlights the proactive nature of character skills—entrepreneurs learned to anticipate market changes, develop creative ideas, and innovate by introducing new products.
  4. Resilience and Problem Solving: Entrepreneurs with strong character skills showed greater resilience and resourcefulness when facing financial challenges, illustrating their ability to maintain productivity and devise solutions despite adversity.
  5. Conclusion: The critical takeaway is that character skills, through enhancing proactivity and resilience, empower entrepreneurs to not just seize opportunities but to create them. This aligns with the correct answer: "Character skills enable you to generate opportunities rather than capitalize on existing ones."

By focusing on developing character skills, entrepreneurs increase their capacity to adapt, innovate, and maintain their core values, even when facing significant challenges, proving the long-term value of character skills over mere cognitive abilities.

Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

Approach Solution -2

Step 1: Recall findings.
The passage said cognitive skills (finance, marketing) help founders capitalize on existing opportunities, but character skills (discipline, proactivity, resilience) enabled them to create new opportunities and overcome obstacles.
Step 2: Evaluate options.
- Option A: Too simplistic — being “poor in finance” is not the core argument. - Option B: Perfect fit — directly reflects passage’s statement about generating opportunities. - Option C: True but secondary; not the main reason given. - Option D: Unsupported — no evidence that entrepreneurs only lack character skills. - Option E: True but vague; “uncertain future” is not highlighted as main reason.
Step 3: Conclusion.
Thus, the correct answer is Option B.
Final Answer: \[ \boxed{\text{B}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions