Question

Read the following paragraph and answer the question that follows:
When asked what the politician will do for the nation’s economy,he attacked the opponent by saying, “Look at that face! Would anyone vote for that? I mean, she’s a woman, and I’m not supposed to say bad things, but really,folks,come on.Are we serious?Nevertheless,we’re going to defeat ISIS. ISIS happened a number of years ago in a vacuum that was left because of bad judgment.And I will tell you, I will take care of ISIS.” Which of the following statements BEST describes the politician’s intent?

• A. To make an emotional appeal to the voters
• B. To appeal to the macho voters and use fear as a tool to lure voters
• C. To divert attention towards ISIS as compared to the economy
• D. To make a sexist remark and share his concern about an important issue
• E. To digress and argue that security is more important than economy

Answer 1

The Correct Option is A

The paragraph quoted involves a politician using rhetoric that focuses less on the actual economic question posed and more on stirring an emotional reaction. The politician diverts the conversation away from concrete economic policies using personal attacks and a strong appeal to emotion, particularly related to fear and security. Additionally, he expresses concern for handling ISIS, using this topic to generate a different emotional response from voters. This approach is a tactic often used in political communication to create an emotional connection with the audience, thereby influencing them without providing direct answers related to the original question about the economy.

Considering the options provided, let's analyze them in context:

• Using an emotional appeal is a strategy to sway voters by resonating with their feelings rather than addressing policy specifics, aligning with the diversion and emotive language used in the speech.
• An appeal to the macho voters and use of fear is suggested, but the primary tactic in the excerpt is more about shifting focus than targeting specific voter demographics.
• The politician talks about ISIS instead of the economy, showing an intent to redirect attention.
• The sexist remark and concern about an issue are present, but the central focus is not solely on sexist remarks as a primary intent.
• The mention of security over the economy is part of the diversion tactic but doesn’t entirely capture the broader intention of the speech.

Ultimately, the statement that best describes the politician’s intent is: To make an emotional appeal to the voters.