Comprehension
Read the following discussion/passage and provide an appropriate answer for the questions that follow.
Of the several features of the Toyota Production System that have been widely studied, most important is the mode of governance of the shop - oor at Toyota. Work and inter - relations between workers are highly scripted in extremely detailed ‘operating procedures’ that have to be followed rigidly, without any deviation at Toyota. Despite such rule - bound rigidity, however, Toyota does not become a ‘command - control system’. It is able to retain the character of a learning organization
In fact, many observers characterize it as a community of scientists carrying out several small experiments simultaneously. The design of the operating procedure is the key. Every principal must nd an expression in the operating procedure – that is how it has an effect in the domain of action. Workers on the shop - oor, often in teams, design the ‘operating procedure’ jointly with the supervisor through a series of hypothesis that are proposed and validated or refuted through experiments in action. The rigid and detailed ‘operating procedure’ speci cation throws up problems of the very minute kind; while its resolution leads to a reframing of the procedure and speci cations. This inter - temporal change (or exibility) of the speci cation (or operating procedure) is done at the lowest level of the organization; i.e. closest to the site of action.
One implication of this arrangement is that system design can no longer be rationally optimal and standardized across the organization. It is quite common to nd different work norms in contiguous assembly lines, because each might have faced a different set of problems and devised different counter - measures to tackle it. Design of the coordinating process that essentially imposes the discipline that is required in large - scale complex manufacturing systems is therefore customized to variations in man - machine context of the site of action. It evolves through numerous points of negotiation throughout the organization. It implies then that the higher levels of the hierarchy do not exercise the power of the at in setting work rules, for such work rules are no longer a standard set across the whole organization.
It might be interesting to go through the basic Toyota philosophy that underlines its system designing practices. The notion of the ideal production system in Toyota embraces the following -‘the ability to deliver just- in - time (or on demand) a customer order in the exact speci cation demanded, in a batch size of one (and hence an in nite proliferation of variants, models and speci cations), defect - free, without wastage of material, labour, energy or motion in a safe and (physically and emotionally) ful lling production environment’. It did not embrace the concept of a standardized product that can be cheap by giving up variations. Preserving consumption variety was seen, in fact, as one mode of serving society. It is interesting to note that the articulation of the Toyota philosophy was made around roughly the same time that the Fordist system was establishing itself in the US automotive industry.
Question: 1

What can be best defended as the asset which Toyota model of production leverages to give the vast range of models in a defect-free fashion?

Show Hint

In RC-based analogy or reasoning questions, always look for the keyword emphasis in the passage. Here, “workers evolving solutions” was repeated, guiding us directly to the correct answer.
Updated On: Aug 23, 2025
  • Large scale complex manufacturing systems
  • Intellectual capital of the company’s management
  • Loans taken by the company from banks and financial institutions
  • Ability of the workers to evolve solutions to problems
  • Skill and charisma of the top leadership
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Extract the core idea from the passage.
The passage emphasizes that Toyota’s production system relies on \emph{workers at the shop-floor level} who design and refine detailed “operating procedures.” These procedures are continuously adjusted based on real-time problems encountered. This makes Toyota not just a command-control system, but a \emph{learning organization}.

Step 2: Identify the asset that enables defect-free production.
Toyota’s ability to maintain flexibility, produce many variants, and maintain defect-free quality does not come merely from machinery, loans, or leadership charisma. Instead, it comes from the workers’ capacity to detect minute issues and resolve them effectively by modifying procedures.

Step 3: Evaluate each option.
- (A) Large scale systems → Too generic; Toyota emphasizes adaptability, not just scale. ✗
- (B) Intellectual capital of management → Focus is on workers, not top management. ✗
- (C) Loans/finances → Irrelevant to production philosophy. ✗
- (D) Workers’ ability to evolve solutions → Matches perfectly with the passage’s emphasis on constant problem-solving at the lowest level. ✓
- (E) Charismatic leadership → Not highlighted in the passage. ✗


Step 4: Conclude.
The asset that Toyota leverages is not infrastructure or financial resources, but the \emph{problem-solving ability of workers}, enabling variety and quality simultaneously. \[ \boxed{\text{Ability of workers to evolve solutions to problems (D)}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

Which of the following can be best defended as a pre-condition for the Toyota type of production system to work?

Show Hint

In RC passages on organizational models, focus on the principle of delegation vs. centralization. Toyota emphasizes decentralization and worker empowerment, making management’s faith the natural precondition.
Updated On: Aug 23, 2025
  • Existence of workers’ union to protect workers’ rights
  • Existence of powerful management to create unique strategies
  • Cordial worker-management relations to have industrial peace
  • High management involvement towards problems identified by workers
  • Management’s faith in workers’ abilities to solve problems in a rigorous manner
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Revisit the passage.
The passage stresses that Toyota’s system places responsibility at the shop-floor level, where workers themselves refine procedures. This system can function only if management places trust in the workers’ capability to solve problems.

Step 2: Test each option.
- (A) Workers’ union → Not mentioned in context. ✗
- (B) Powerful management → Toyota is explicitly described as \emph{not} being a command-control system. ✗
- (C) Cordial relations → Helpful but not central to Toyota’s philosophy. ✗
- (D) High management involvement → Opposite to what Toyota practices, since flexibility and decisions rest with workers. ✗
- (E) Management’s faith in workers → Exactly what enables the system, as per the text. ✓


Step 3: Conclude.
For Toyota’s production style to succeed, it is essential that management believes in and empowers workers to resolve problems rigorously. \[ \boxed{\text{Management’s faith in workers’ abilities (E)}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3

Based on the above passage, which of the following statements is best justified?

Show Hint

When answering inference questions, always locate the “agency” in the passage. Here, the workers were the agents of change, so options focusing on managers or external specialists could be eliminated.
Updated On: Aug 23, 2025
  • Workers have significant control rights over the design of work rules that allow worker skills and ingenuity to continuously search for novel micro-solutions using information that often sticks to the local micro-context of the work.
  • Managers have significant control rights over the design of work rules that allow worker skills and ingenuity to continuously search for novel micro-solutions around micro-information that often sticks to the local micro-context of the work.
  • Work rules enable the workers to report problems faced at the shop-floor to specialised personnel who set up experiments to replicate the conditions. This allows the specialists to come up with solutions that are rigorously tested in experimental conditions.
  • Toyota as an organisation has extensive networks with different specialists who are subject matter experts in different fields. These networks allow problems to be resolved in the most advanced manner, enabling Toyota to beat the competition.
  • Toyota’s products are extensively tested by customers in simulated conditions before they are released to the market. This extensive testing is done by workers who double up as a community of scientists experimenting to develop the most advanced product.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Recall the central idea of the passage.
The passage emphasizes that Toyota’s production system is not a top-down command-control model. Instead, it is based on \emph{workers at the shop-floor level} continuously identifying problems, experimenting, and refining detailed operating procedures. This grants them autonomy and makes the system flexible and innovative.

Step 2: Match options with passage ideas.
- (A)

Workers’ control over design of work rules: This aligns directly with the passage, which states that operating procedures are developed and refined by workers and supervisors jointly. It highlights local problem-solving and the creation of micro-solutions. ✓
- (B)

Managers’ control over design of rules: The passage states clearly that higher levels do not exercise fiat in work rules, making this option incorrect. ✗
- (C)

Specialists’ replication of problems: The passage emphasizes \emph{workers themselves} resolving issues, not escalation to external specialists. ✗
- (D)

Networks of specialists: This is not supported; Toyota’s uniqueness lies in grassroots worker problem-solving, not expert networks. ✗
- (E)

Customer testing before release: This is not mentioned in the passage; workers’ experiments happen internally on the shop-floor. ✗


Step 3: Conclude.
Since Toyota’s philosophy empowers workers to adapt procedures to micro-contexts and resolve problems through experimentation, option (A) is best justified. \[ \boxed{\text{Workers’ control over design of work rules (A)}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 4

What could be the best defence of the “different work norms in contiguous assembly lines”?

Show Hint

When passages emphasize \emph{variation or flexibility}, the defence usually lies in the advantages of adaptability rather than the efficiency of uniformity.
Updated On: Aug 23, 2025
  • Without such variation allowed, rights of managers to design work-rules would have made very little sense, making the company similar to Ford.
  • Prescribing standardised work norms would prevent Toyota from benefiting from workers’ problem solving ability in resolving different kinds of problems that emerge, thus making it difficult to attain the Toyota philosophy.
  • If similarities were imposed, rights of workers to experiment with work-rules would have made very little sense.
  • Standardisation of work rules is only justified when the investments in plants are huge and experimenting with the work rules would be detrimental to the efficiency of the plants. Since Toyota’s plants typically involved low investment, it could tolerate non-standard work rules.
  • With standardisation of processes, right of the workers in design of work-rules made sense. Since Toyota’s manufacturing processes were non-standardised, the different work norms did not make sense.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Recall the problem.
The passage mentions that it is common to find \emph{different work norms} in contiguous assembly lines at Toyota because each line faces distinct problems. Workers adapt and design rules accordingly.

Step 2: Interpret the implication.
The existence of different norms is not a flaw but a strength. It reflects Toyota’s philosophy that solutions should be localized to specific problems instead of imposing uniformity.

Step 3: Evaluate options.
- (A) Talks about managers’ rights, but the passage stresses workers’ autonomy. ✗
- (B) Explains that prescribing uniform standards would eliminate Toyota’s advantage: workers’ problem-solving ability at the micro-level. This directly matches the passage’s message. ✓
- (C) True in part, but less precise. The reasoning is weaker compared to (B). ✗
- (D) Mentions investments in plants — irrelevant to the passage. ✗
- (E) Claims different work norms did not make sense, which contradicts the passage. ✗


Step 4: Conclude.
The best defence of Toyota’s different work norms is that flexibility allows workers to solve unique problems locally, whereas standardisation would hinder the Toyota philosophy. \[ \boxed{\text{Standardisation prevents problem-solving (B)}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

View More Questions