Let's solve the problem step by step.
Initially, the ratio of the number of male employees to the total number of employees in the company is 5:8. Let the total number of employees be \(8x\). Then the number of male employees is \(5x\), and the number of female employees is \(8x-5x=3x\).
If 200 female employees join, the number of female employees becomes \(3x+200\).
We are given that the number of male employees is 25% more than that of the female employees. Therefore, the number of male employees, \(5x\), is 125% of the female employees. This can be expressed as:
\[ 5x = 1.25 \times (3x + 200) \]
Expanding this equation gives:
\[ 5x = 1.25 \times 3x + 1.25 \times 200 \]
\[ 5x = 3.75x + 250 \]
Subtract \(3.75x\) from both sides:
\[ 5x - 3.75x = 250 \]
\[ 1.25x = 250 \]
Dividing both sides by 1.25:
\[ x = \frac{250}{1.25} = 200 \]
Now we calculate the number of female employees finally:
The original number of female employees is \(3x=3 \times 200 = 600\).
After adding 200 female employees, the total number of female employees becomes:
\[ 600 + 200 = 800 \]
Thus, the final number of female employees in the company is 800.
A shopkeeper marks his goods 40% above cost price and offers a discount of 20%. What is his overall profit percentage?
Health insurance plays a vital role in ensuring financial protection and access to quality healthcare. In India, however, the extent and nature of health insurance coverage vary significantly between urban and rural areas. While urban populations often have better access to organized insurance schemes, employer-provided coverage, and awareness about health policies, rural populations face challenges such as limited outreach of insurance schemes, inadequate infrastructure, and lower awareness levels. This urban-rural divide in health insurance coverage highlights the broader issue of healthcare inequality, making it essential to analyze the factors contributing to this gap and explore strategies for more inclusive health protection. A state-level health survey was conducted.
The survey covered 1,80,000 adults across urban and rural areas. Urban residents formed 55% of the sample (that is, 99,000 people) while rural residents made up 45% (that is, 81,000 people). In each area, coverage was classified under four heads – Public schemes, Private insurance, Employer-provided coverage, and Uninsured. In urban areas, Public coverage accounted for 28% of the urban population, Private for 22%, Employer for 18%, and the remaining 32% were Uninsured. In rural areas, where formal coverage is generally lower, Public coverage stood at 35%, Private at 10%, Employer at 8%, while 47% were Uninsured.
For this survey, “Insured” includes everyone covered by Public + Private + Employer schemes, and “Uninsured” indicates those with no coverage at all. Officials noted that public schemes remain the backbone of rural coverage, while employer and private plans are relatively more prevalent in urban centres. (250 words)