Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The question asks to determine the offence committed by Rahul based on his act, intention, knowledge, and the resulting death of Ramu. This requires an analysis under the provisions for culpable homicide and murder in the Indian Penal Code.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
1. Causation: Did Rahul cause Ramu's death? Explanation 1 to Section 299 (Culpable Homicide) states that a person who causes bodily injury to another who is labouring under a disorder and thereby accelerates their death is deemed to have caused that death. Causing a severe shock which leads to a fatal heart attack in a person known to have a heart condition qualifies as causing death.
2. Culpable Homicide (Section 299): Is the act culpable homicide? It is, if it is done with:
(a) the intention of causing death; or
(b) the intention of causing such bodily injury as is likely to cause death; or
(c) the knowledge that the act is likely to cause death.
The facts explicitly state that Rahul acted with the intention to kill Ramu. So, condition (a) is met. The act is culpable homicide.
3. Murder (Section 300): Is the culpable homicide murder? Culpable homicide is murder if the act by which the death is caused falls under any of the four clauses of Section 300.
- Clause 1 of Section 300: "culpable homicide is murder, if the act by which the death is caused is done with the intention of causing death..."
Since the facts clearly state that Rahul's intention was to kill Ramu, his act directly falls under the first clause of Section 300. It is murder. It does not fall under any of the exceptions to Section 300.
Step 3: Final Answer:
Here Rahul is liable for the offence of Murder.