Question:
Ram and Shyam, graduates of IIT Madras and Bombay, respectively, develop separate code for food delivery apps around the same time. Both apps are unique in their expressions of the idea. However, neither Ram nor Shyam holds copyright over the idea of a food delivery app itself. What does this scenario imply regarding the copyright ownership?
Ram and Shyam, graduates of IIT Madras and Bombay, respectively, develop separate code for food delivery apps around the same time. Both apps are unique in their expressions of the idea. However, neither Ram nor Shyam holds copyright over the idea of a food delivery app itself. What does this scenario imply regarding the copyright ownership?
Show Hint
Copyright protection only extends to the expression of an idea, not the idea itself.
Updated On: Dec 3, 2025
- Ram and Shyam each hold copyright over their respective code for the food delivery apps, as they represent unique expressions of their ideas. However, neither Ram nor Shyam holds the copyright over the idea of a food delivery app.
- Ram holds the copyright over his code, while Shyam holds the copyright over his code. Additionally, they both collectively hold the copyright over the idea of a food delivery app.
- Ram and Shyam share copyright as joint authors over both codes and ideas of a food delivery app since they both independently developed similar applications.
- Neither Ram nor Shyam holds copyright over their respective codes or the idea of the food delivery app, as the software is a subject matter which is not granted copyright protection under law.
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is A
Solution and Explanation
Copyright protects the expression of an idea but not the idea itself. Ram and Shyam’s unique codes are protected, but the concept of a food delivery app cannot be copyrighted.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top Questions on Copyright Law
- In the context of registering fashion designs in India, which of the following statements reflects the distinction/overlap between copyright protection and industrial design protection?
- Rahul, an author, published a series of novels that gained widespread popularity and critical acclaim. The copyright protection of the novel is set to expire soon. His representatives/estate are concerned about the future of the works once they enter the public domain. They wish to maintain some control over the use and distribution of the novels even after the expiration of the copyright period.
- Which of the following statements regarding Open Source Software (OSS) and copyright protection is accurate based on the information that has been given below?
- Which of the following is true about the remedies that are available for design piracy as has been mentioned in the provided information?
- Which of the following elements can be considered as part of Industrial Design?
View More Questions
Questions Asked in AILET IP-JOINT MASTERS exam
- Umberto Eco, an Italian writer, was right when he said the language of Europe is transla tion. Netflix and other deep-pocketed global firms speak it well. Just as the EU employs a small army of translators and interpreters to turn intricate laws or impassioned speeches of Romanian MEPs into the EU’s 24 official languages, so do the likes of Netflix. It now offers dubbing in 34 languages and subtitling in a few more. The economics of European productions are more appealing, too. American audiences are more willing than before to give dubbed or subtitled viewing a chance. This means shows such as ”Lupin”, a French crime caper on Netflix, can become global hits. In 2015, about 75percent of Net flix’s original content was American; now the figure is half, according to Ampere, a media analysis company. Netflix has about 100 productions under way in Europe, which is more than big public broadcasters in France or Germany. Not everything works across borders. Comedy sometimes struggles. Whodunits and bloodthirsty maelstroms between arch Ro mans and uppity tribesmen have a more universal appeal. Some do it better than others. Barbarians aside, German television is not always built for export, says one executive, being polite. A bigger problem is that national broadcasters still dominate. Streaming services, such as Netflix or Disney+, account for about a third of all viewing hours, even in markets where they are well-established. Europe is an ageing continent. The generation of teens staring at phones is outnumbered by their elders who prefer to gawp at the box. In Brussels and national capitals, the prospect of Netflix as a cultural hegemon is seen as a threat. ”Cultural sovereignty” is the watchword of European executives worried that the Americans will eat their lunch. To be fair, Netflix content sometimes seems stuck in an uncanny valley somewhere in the mid-Atlantic, with local quirks stripped out. Netflix originals tend to have fewer specific cultural references than shows produced by domestic rivals, according to Enders, a market analyst. The company used to have an imperial model of commissioning, with executives in Los Angeles cooking up ideas French people might like. Now Netflix has offices across Europe. But ultimately the big decisions rest with American executives. This makes European politicians nervous. They should not be. An irony of European integration is that it is often American companies that facilitate it. Google Translate makes European newspapers comprehensible, even if a little clunky, for the continent’s non-polyglots. American social-media companies make it easier for Europeans to talk politics across borders. (That they do not always like to hear what they say about each other is another matter.) Now Netflix and friends pump the same content into homes across a continent, making culture a cross-border endeavour, too. If Europeans are to share a currency, bail each other out in times of financial need and share vaccines in a pandemic, then they need to have something in common—even if it is just bingeing on the same series. Watching fictitious northern and southern Europeans tear each other apart 2,000 years ago beats doing so in reality
- AILET IP-JOINT MASTERS - 2025
- Reading Comprehension
The hum of humanity around was increasing. His awareness of his surrounding was gradually lessening in a sort of inverse proportion. He was not aware of it, but the world was beginning to press around. The pen of the wandering journalist had done the trick. Its repercussions were far and wide. The railways were the first to feel the pressure. They had to run special trains for the crows that were going to Malgudi. People travelled on footboards and on the roofs of coaches. The Malgudi station was choked with passengers. Outside, the station buses stood, the conductors crying,’Special for Malgudi leaving. Hurry up, Hurry up.‘ People rushed up from the station into the buses and almost sat on top of one another.
- AILET IP-JOINT MASTERS - 2025
- Logical Reasoning
Intellectual humility was rarely discussed between 1800 and the early 2000s, but in the early 2010s, the number of mentions the trait received began to grow exponentially. Enthusiasm for intellectual humility, then, looks to be bound up with a specific set of epistemological anxieties related to information management in the age of the internet and social media. (Facebook was founded in 2004.) And, indeed, intellectual humility is often said to guard against precisely those pathologies that social media can incubate. When citizens are intellectually humble,‘ write the philosophers Michael Hannon and Ian James Kidd, ’they are less polarised, more tolerant and respectful of others, and display greater empathy for political opponents.‘ The intellectually humble, writes the psychologist Mark Leary, ’think more deeply about information that contradicts their views‘, and ’scrutinise the validity of the information they encounter‘.
- AILET IP-JOINT MASTERS - 2025
- Logical Reasoning
- Artists around the world have been deeply disturbed by the anthropomorphisation of machines designed to steal and devalue their work. The researchers explored the nature of art, clarifying that image generators are not artists. It seems obvious, but if you listen to the AI hype, it clearly needs to be spelled out. As they explain, while art is grounded in the very activities of living, it is the human recognition of cause and effect that transforms activities once performed under organic pressures into activities done for the sake of eliciting some response from the viewer. Art is not only about our experience; it is about our sensitivity to the experience of our audience. It is fundamentally humans reaching out to each other. By contrast, image generators have no understanding of the perspective of the audience or the experience that the output is intended to communicate to this audience. At best the output of image generators is aesthetic, in that it can be appreciated or enjoyed, but it is not artistic or art itself.
- AILET IP-JOINT MASTERS - 2025
- Logical Reasoning
- Intellectual Property Rights are historically classified as:
- AILET IP-JOINT MASTERS - 2025
- Intellectual Property Law
View More Questions