Question:

Principle: The impact of leadership styles on historical events can shape the course of nations and influence the outcomes of conflicts.
Facts: During the late 20th century, two prominent leaders emerged during a territorial dispute: X advocated for peaceful negotiations and diplomacy, while Y supported aggressive military action to assert dominance. After a series of failed internal talks, Y’s approach led to a major conflict, resulting in significant casualties and territorial loss for both sides. In contrast, X’s proposed solution, although initially rejected, eventually gained support and led to de-escalation of the conflict.
Based on the above, which of the following statements is most accurate?

  • Y’s aggressive strategy ultimately resulted in a favourable outcome for his side.
  • X’s diplomatic approach was ineffective since it did not prevent the conflict from escalating
  • The historical context suggests that both X and Y acted correctly based on the circumstances they faced
  • The eventual support for X’s solution highlights the importance of diplomacy in conflict resolution
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

The passage suggests that X’s diplomatic approach was effective in the long run, despite initial setbacks. Therefore, Option (d) best reflects the principle that diplomacy can lead to conflict resolution.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Syllogism

View More Questions

Questions Asked in AILET exam

View More Questions