Question:

Out of the following statements with respect to the postulates of Werner?? theory, (1) the central metal atom of coordination compounds shows two types of valencies (2) the primary valencies are normally non ionisable and are satisfied by neutral molecules or negative ions (3) the secondary valencies are ionisable and are satisfied by negative ions only (4) the ions/groups bound by the secondary linkages to the metal have characteristic spatial arrangements corresponding to different coordination numbers The incorrect statements are

Updated On: Jul 28, 2022
  • $ (1) $ and $ (2) $
  • $ (3) $ and $ (4) $
  • $ (2) $ and $ (4) $
  • $ (2) $ and $ (3) $
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Primary valencies are satisfied by negative ions whereas secondary valencies are satisfied by ligands (neutral molecules or negative ions)
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Concepts Used:

Werner’s Theory of Coordination Compounds

In 1893 Werner produced a theory to explain the structures, formation and nature of bonding in the coordination compounds. This theory is known as Werner’s theory of coordination compounds.

Postulates of Werner's Theory:

The important postulates as observed by Alfred Werner throughout his experiments are as follows:

  • The complex/ coordination compounds contain a central metal atom.
  • The metal atoms in a coordination compound generally show two types of valency: primary valency and secondary valency.
  • The primary valencies denote the oxidation state. They are ionizable and are satisfied by the negative ions.
  • Secondary valencies denote the coordination number. They are non-ionizable and are fixed for every metal atom. The secondary valency is generally satisfied by the neutral molecules or negative ions.
  • The metal atoms should satisfy both primary and secondary valencies.
  • The secondary valency of the atom basically shows the geometry/ polyhedra of the particular coordination compound.

Limitations of Werner’s Theory:

  • Though Werner explained some properties of the coordination compound,  he failed to explain the colour of the coordinate compound.
  • He could not explain the magnetic and optical properties of coordination compounds.
  • He could not answer the question, why does the coordination sphere have a definite geometry.