Let the distance Akash ran on Monday be \( x \) km. Then the distance Akash ran on Tuesday is \( x + 4 \) km (since he ran 4 km more on Tuesday).
For Sanjay, he ran the same distance on both days, and the distance on Monday is \( y \) km. On Tuesday, he ran 5 km more than Akash's distance on Monday, so the distance Sanjay ran on Tuesday is \( y + 5 \) km.
We are asked to find the difference between the total distances covered by Akash and Sanjay over the two days.
- Akash's total distance = \( x + (x + 4) = 2x + 4 \) km.
- Sanjay's total distance = \( y + (y + 5) = 2y + 5 \) km.
We know that Sanjay ran the same total distance as Akash, so: \[ 2x + 4 = 2y + 5 \] Simplifying the equation: \[ 2x - 2y = 1 \Rightarrow x - y = \frac{1}{2} \] Now, calculating the difference in their total distances: \[ \text{Difference} = |(2x + 4) - (2y + 5)| = |1 + 6| = 6 \text{ km} \] Thus, the difference between the distance covered by Akash and Sanjay over the two days is \( \boxed{6} \) km.
How many triangles are there in the figure given below?
Disregard commonly known facts. Which conclusion would follow on the basis of given statements only?
Statement (I): Some bottles are car. Some cars are cycle.
Conclusion: \[\begin{array}{rl} \bullet & \text{[(I)] Some bottles are cycle is a possibility.} \\ \bullet & \text{[(II)] All bottles are cycle.} \\ \end{array}\]
A remote island has a unique social structure. Individuals are either "Truth-tellers" (who always speak the truth) or "Tricksters" (who always lie). You encounter three inhabitants: X, Y, and Z.
X says: "Y is a Trickster"
Y says: "Exactly one of us is a Truth-teller."
What can you definitively conclude about Z?
Consider the following statements followed by two conclusions.
Statements: 1. Some men are great. 2. Some men are wise.
Conclusions: 1. Men are either great or wise. 2. Some men are neither great nor wise. Choose the correct option: