The Navratna Policy was introduced by the Government of India to provide greater financial and operational autonomy to leading PSUs.
Justifications:
1. Increased Operational Freedom:
- The Navratna status allows PSUs greater decision-making power, helping them compete with private enterprises both domestically and globally.
2. Facilitating Disinvestment and Efficiency:
- The policy has encouraged disinvestment, allowing partial privatization, thereby reducing the financial burden on the government.
- It has helped PSUs become self-reliant and more competitive in the global market.
Conclusion: The Navratna policy has played a crucial role in strengthening India’s public sector enterprises, allowing them greater autonomy while encouraging efficiency and privatization.
List-I | List-II |
(A) Rural banking | (I) Micro-credit programmes |
(B) Self-Help Groups | (II) Golden revolution |
(C) Agricultural marketing | (III) Land development banks |
(D) Horticulture | (IV) Distribution of different agricultural commodities across the country |
A school is organizing a debate competition with participants as speakers and judges. $ S = \{S_1, S_2, S_3, S_4\} $ where $ S = \{S_1, S_2, S_3, S_4\} $ represents the set of speakers. The judges are represented by the set: $ J = \{J_1, J_2, J_3\} $ where $ J = \{J_1, J_2, J_3\} $ represents the set of judges. Each speaker can be assigned only one judge. Let $ R $ be a relation from set $ S $ to $ J $ defined as: $ R = \{(x, y) : \text{speaker } x \text{ is judged by judge } y, x \in S, y \in J\} $.