To solve this problem, we need to understand what's happening with the mistake in the reading of the quadratic equation by Sarika and Meera, and then determine the correct roots.
- Let's start by considering the standard form of a quadratic equation, which is \(ax^2 + bx + c = 0\). The roots of this equation can be found using Vieta's formulas:
- The sum of the roots, \(r_1 + r_2\), is \(-\frac{b}{a}\).
- The product of the roots, \(r_1 \times r_2\), is \(\frac{c}{a}\).
- Sarika obtained roots 12 and 16. Therefore:
- Sum of roots = \(12 + 16 = 28\), which gives \(-\frac{b}{a} = 28\).
- Product of roots = \(12 \times 16 = 192\), which gives \(\frac{c}{a} = 192\).
- Meera obtained roots 22 and 6. Therefore:
- Sum of roots = \(22 + 6 = 28\), which again gives \(-\frac{b}{a} = 28\).
- Product of roots = \(22 \times 6 = 132\), which implies an incorrect reading of \(c\).
- Although both obtained different products (Sarika: 192, Meera: 132), they have the same sum \(28\). Therefore, the correct sum of the roots is \(28\), pointing out a consistent effect on the \(b\) term.
- The correct equation should have integers that multiply to give \(192\) and add to \(28\). The integer factors of 192 closest to a sum of 28 are 12 and 16, the roots found by Sarika.
- Thus, the correct roots of the original quadratic equation are 12 and 16.
Therefore, the correct option is (C) and (D) only, corresponding to the roots 12 and 16.