Step 1: Matching the statements with the corresponding logical fallacies.
- A. It said fine for parking, so I parked my car here: This is an example of Equivocation because the term "fine" is used ambiguously.
- B. She is not famous because she is not well known: This is an example of Petitio Principii (circular reasoning) because it repeats the same idea.
- C. I can lift every single part of my car. So, I can lift my car: This is a classic example of Composition as it assumes that what is true for individual parts is true for the whole.
- D. Have you stopped cheating in your exams?: This is a Complex Question fallacy, where the question assumes something is true, such as cheating.
Step 2: Conclusion.
The correct match is:
- A - III (Equivocation)
- B - I (Petitio Principii)
- C - II (Composition)
- D - IV (Complex Question)
Final Answer:
\[
\boxed{\text{The correct answer is 1. A - III, B - I, C - II, D - IV.}}
\]