Step 1: Properness of the greedy rule (A).
At the moment we color $v_i$, the algorithm chooses the smallest color that is not present among already colored neighbours of $v_i$. Hence $v_i$ never receives a color used by any of its neighbours. Repeating this for every $v_i$ ensures adjacent vertices get different colors $\Rightarrow$ the coloring is proper. Thus, (A) True.
Step 2: Upper bound on colors used (B).
When coloring $v_i$, it can have at most $\Delta(G)$ neighbours, so there are at most $\Delta(G)$ forbidden colors. Therefore at least one color from the set $\{1,2,\ldots,\Delta(G)+1\}$ is available. Hence the greedy algorithm uses no more than $\Delta(G)+1$ colors overall. Thus, (B) True.
Step 3: Why (C) is False.
The complete graph $K_{\Delta(G)+1}$ has $\Delta(G)=\Delta$ but requires $\Delta+1$ colors. The greedy algorithm (indeed, any proper coloring) may need $\Delta+1$ colors, contradicting the bound $\le \Delta(G)$. Hence (C) False.
Step 4: Why (D) is not guaranteed.
The greedy algorithm depends on the vertex order and can use more colors than the chromatic number. Example: a path on three vertices ordered poorly can use $3$ colors though $\chi(P_3)=2$. Therefore (D) False.
\[
\boxed{\text{Correct Options: (A) and (B)}}
\]