Question

'Larger states should be divided into smaller states.' Present arguments in support of this statement.

Hint:

When discussing the division of states, consider the political, economic, and cultural impacts it could have on the citizens and the overall functioning of the country.

Answer 1

Step 1: Introduction.
The division of large states into smaller ones is a topic of significant debate. Proponents of this view argue that smaller states allow for better governance, improved administration, and more focused resource distribution. Step 2: Advantages of Smaller States.
- Better Governance: Smaller states have more manageable administrative boundaries, leading to faster decision-making processes and closer connection between government officials and local populations.
- Efficient Resource Allocation: With smaller states, resource allocation can be more targeted. Resources can be distributed more equitably and according to the specific needs of the people within the state.
- Cultural and Linguistic Unity: Smaller states can be more representative of the cultural, linguistic, or regional identity of their populations. This ensures that the governance system reflects the diversity within the state.
- Economic Growth: Smaller states may have the potential for focused economic development policies. They can specialize in industries that cater to their regional strengths, fostering more innovation and employment.
Step 3: Conclusion.
In conclusion, dividing larger states into smaller ones can lead to more efficient governance, improved resource allocation, and a stronger connection between the government and the people, all of which contribute to the overall development of the region.